d The State party refers to the Committee's jurisprudence on this issue case No. 1 84, A. Yilmaz v.

7.2 The issue before the Committee is whether the interception and recording of the author's telephone calls with Mr. A.T.M.M.

(a) Defer consideration of the item entitled Zone of peace and cooperation of the South Atlantic as well as the report of the Secretary General and to include the item in the provisional agenda of its sixty first session

6.2 The Committee ascertained, as it is required to do under article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol, that the case was not under examination by another instance of international investigation or settlement.

(a) Steps taken to seek adjustment of the matter in accordance with article 21, paragraphs 1 (a) and (b), of the Convention, including the text of the initial communication and of any subsequent written explanations or statements by the States parties concerned which are pertinent to the matter

It was also noted that the saving clause in article 20(a) of the Convention adequately covered the concerns of Costa Rica and there was no need for further clarification of the matter.

It was also noted that the saving clause in article 20(a) of the Convention adequately covered the concerns of Costa Rica and there was no need for further clarification of the matter.

The Committee recommends that the State party consider reviewing section 26 (2) (a) of its Constitution, so as to bring it into line with the provisions of the Convention, and update the Committee on this matter in the next periodic report.

6.2 The Committee has ascertained, as it is required to do under article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Convention, that the same matter has not been, and is not being, examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.

Europe s New Jewish Question

6.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

Technical work on the issue has continued in the Bretton Woods institutions and further consideration of this issue is envisaged.

The China Question

I The issue

The issue

The key dispute is over Cyprus.

C. Consideration by the United Nations

Consideration of the question by the United Nations

6.2 The State party invokes its reservation to article 5, paragraph (a), of the Optional Protocol, arguing that the same matter was already examined by the European Court of Human Rights.

6.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

10.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

4.3 The Committee has ascertained, as required under article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol, that the matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.

7.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

4.2 The Committee has ascertained, as required under article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol, that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.

Further work was undertaken by the SBSTA on this matter and the COP adopted decision 13 CP.10 that revises and replaces the sections of the guidelines for reporting and review of information on assigned amounts and national registries adopted by decision 22 CP.8.

Step IX at levels S 4 to S 7, step XI at level S 3 and step XIII at level S 2 are long service steps.

4.3 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

5.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

6.2 The Committee has ascertained, as it is required to do under article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol, that the case is not under examination by another instance of international investigation or settlement.

4.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

Cognizant of decisions 11 CP.7, 15 CP.7, 17 CP.7, 19 CP.7, 20 CP.7, 21 CP.7, 22 CP.7, 23 CP.7, 21 CP.8, 22 CP.8, 13 CP.9, 18 CP.9 and its annex II, and 19 CP.9,

That question should perhaps be made clear in the commentary.

We look forward to a discussion on the matter next year.

Addressing the issue in the Guide only would not be sufficient.

This matter is dealt with in the next paragraph (d).

The United Nations is not alone on this issue.

UNAMA is facilitating discussions in this matter.

Recalling its decisions 11 CP.1, 13 CP.1, 7 CP.2, 9 CP.3, 2 CP.4, 4 CP.4, 9 CP.5, 4 CP.7, 10 CP.8, and 6 CP.10,

The question is this.

It is as simple as that.

7.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a) of the Optional Protocol.

(cc) In connection with item 11 (c) Mr.

6.2 The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol.

4.2 The Committee has ascertained, as required under article 5, paragraph 2 (a), of the Optional Protocol, that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.

The Committee has ascertained, as it is required to do under article 22, paragraph 5 (a), of the Convention that the same matter has not been, and is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.