Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant,

a) Failure to provide the required information or providing false information by the applicant.

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant, his counsel and the State party,

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant of the complaint, his counsel and the State party,

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant and the State party,

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the author of the communication and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication,

All the material he submitted relates to access to legal documents and computers.

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant, his counsel and the State party,

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant, his counsel and the State party,

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant, her counsel and the State party,

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant, his counsel and the State party,

Having taken into account all information made available to it by the complainant and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

It should be reiterated that the information at issue was considerably more serious than that provided by the complainant a year earlier and that it concerned the same time period.

However, the author's claims in this regard are general, and the Committee considers that the author has failed to provide sufficiently detailed information in order to substantiate them.

It cited the fact that the information about the torture to which the complainant had been subjected had not been disclosed prior to the Aliens Appeal Board as one of the reasons for questioning the complainant's claims.a

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication and the State party,

Having taken into account all written information made available to it by the author of the communication, and the State party,

The Committee may approve a questionnaire for the purpose of requesting the above mentioned information from the author of the communication.

The author's conviction for such publication cannot be considered excessive in the context of the conditions obtaining in the State party.

It is a legal document starting from the moment it is accepted, and the declarant bears a responsibility for the inaccuracy of information declared by him.

4.18 The State party also states that the information provided by the complainant about his marital status is unclear.

The complainant criticized the reliability of the information concerning Sri Lanka that was before RRT.

Where the third party was unable to verify the documents proffered by the claimant or provided statements inconsistent with the information provided by the claimant, the Panel finds the evidence submitted by the claimant to be unreliable.

In the Board's view, on the basis of the information before it, the complainant could be considered entitled to claim refugee status however, the Security Police's assessment, which the Board saw no reason to question, pointed in a different direction.

Further to this decision, the author resubmitted and updated his communication to the Committee in March 1998.

Counsel viewed this newly disclosed information as a clear indication that the complainant had been subjected to torture.

The risk of reprisals was not deemed to be insignificant, irrespective of whether the information was correct or not.

In any event, having already endured reprisals, there was nothing left for the State party to protect against in withholding information.

On 23 February 1996, the author was present and the court ordered that information about the commencement of the liquidation proceedings be entered into the Commercial Register.

4.6 As to the author's allegation that he was not compensated for his unlawful detention in 1981 1982, the Committee considers that the author has not provided sufficient information to substantiate his claim, for purposes of admissibility.

On the basis of the information obtained by this operation, a preliminary inquiry was opened against the author himself, and the interception of his own telephone line was authorized.

The Tribunal stated that it does not attach importance to minor inconsistencies of detail arising from the complainant's original submission.

In such a case, there was an apparent risk that the disclosure of the information would put the complainant at risk of further ill treatment and maybe even of torture.

The State party accounted for the information submitted by the complainant, and the Egyptian authorities' reactions to it, in its submissions to the Committee of 26 March 2003.

In the light of this information, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for the alleged currency loss despite the fact that the claimant submitted the banknotes to the Commission.

According to counsel, the information available indicates that he is held in a 2 m2 cell, which is artificially cooled, dark, and without a mattress.