The accused is innocent until proven guilty.

So it's a case of innocent until proven guilty.

'That PROVES his guilt,' said the Queen.

A person found guilty of an offence is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for life.

So what PlPA and SOPA risk doing is taking a centuries old legal concept, innocent until proven guilty, and reversing it guilty until proven innocent.

(iv) Ensuring due process of law and the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law

Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

The author claims that in such circumstances her son's right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty was violated.

His conviction is curious.

Sami is waiting to be sentenced.

This must be condemned.

6.2 In relation to the author's claim that her son was not presumed innocent until proved guilty, the author has made detailed submissions which the State party has not addressed.

The presumption of innocence is cemented in the Constitution and an accused person is presumed innocent until proved guilty. Therefore, the onus is on the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

However, his conviction stands.

(b) Aggravating circumstances, inter alia in the event of the death of the victim or the commission of an enforced disappearance in respect of pregnant women, minors or other particularly vulnerable persons.

It holds up the beam and that holds up the ceiling.

Steady keel.

So to prove this, you're essentially proving what this means.

The mountains tent pins ?

And the mountains as pegs ?

and the mountains as pegs ?

And the mountains as stakes ?

And the mountains pegs ?

and fixed the mountains like pegs ,

And the high hills bulwarks ?

and the mountains stakes ?

and the mountains as pegs ( to anchor the earth ) ?

And the mountains as projections ( thereon ) ?

and raised the mountains like supporting poles ?

With a paper to prove it.

Our papers prove it!

He also submitted an appeal against his conviction for contempt, on the grounds that no charge was read out to him before conviction and that the sentence was disproportionate.

The thing is, he's out now... and blames me for his conviction.

Can you prove it?

Guilty until proven innocent?

You can prove it here.

She never proved a thing!

What are you trying to prove?

What are you trying to prove?

To a standstill.

What's she trying to prove?

Sami made three appeals against his conviction. Each one was dismissed.

Initially, Khrushchev didn t plan to keep his denunciation of Stalin a secret.

He was held on suspicion of terrorism and then released with no charges.

He should, upon conviction, be punished for escaping from lawful custody.