In paragraph 1 it is stated that the general liability is based on negligence.

The liability for the description of the goods would then become a strict one according to 31(2) On the other hand some delegations have stated that the liability for breach of the article 30 ought to be entirely based on negligence.

Responsibility for omission exists when there is failure to carry out the duty to guarantee these rights, to the extent that such failure is not deliberate and there has been no participation by State agents in the preparation, commission or cover up of the violation.

The EU s Rules to Default By

The lack of grounds was not rectified during the oral proceedings owing to counsel's failure to appear.

persons suspended of their duties as a tutor or a guardian for the improper performance of the duties assigned to them by law

Inertia was not always Israel s way.

Responsibility to protect

The Responsibility to Protect Migrants

Protecting Civilians Responsibly

The Responsibility to Protect Libyans

Extend the responsibility for implementing the provisions of the Convention to the level of the individual.

The Houthis denied responsibility for this attack.

Liability for intentional or reckless behaviour

The alternative text is based on the assumption that the liability for not providing the reasonable information, documents, etc. ought to be based on negligence with a reversed burden of proof (the text mirrors in this respect the provision on carrier liability) and that the scope of the provision should be the relationship between the shipper and the carrier.

The conditions in Greece are now hopeless, and are likely to lead to further defaults and a withdrawal from the eurozone.

That default will be due in large part to its membership in the European Monetary Union.

That is why we speak of shared responsibility.

According to section 1 of chapter 5 of the Finnish Damages and Tort Liability Act of 1974, damages shall constitute compensation for the personal injury and damage to property.

Many participants expressed strong criticism of the uneven focus of the pillars of United Nations reform for its short changing of the linkages with development as a cornerstone of human security.

We must advance the responsibility to protect.

The Welsh Government has responsibility for education in Wales.

In this respect, we embrace the concept of responsibility to protect .

All of us share in the responsibility for relieving their suffering.

Developing countries have the prime responsibility for their own development.

Chinese leaders blame Taiwanese leaders for cross straits tensions, and blame the Dalai Lama for all that ails Tibet.

At its eighth session (Vienna, 5 9 September 2005), the Working Group considered recommendations in chapters VII (Pre default rights and obligations), VIII (Default and enforcement), IX (Insolvency), X (Acquisition financing) and XI (Conflict of laws).

International liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law (International liability in case of loss from transboundary hazardous activities)

Why do we tend to underinvest in the resilience of our economies key systems?

Although there is a shortfall in funding for the critical elements of reintegration and security sector reform, those processes are also ongoing.

We believe it is the primary and primordial responsibility of each State to protect its population and for that reason we fully support the concept of the responsibility to protect.

Thus, it combines responsibility for past emissions and equal per capita rights.

Major companies need to accept responsibility for their actions.

The onus is not on developed countries alone.

But Germany is not innocent of responsibility for this crisis.

A country in trouble retains primary responsibility for correcting policy.

The National Assembly for Wales has responsibility for education in Wales.

Young people should take responsibility for developing their own societies.

We all share responsibility for each other's development and security.

The responsibility to protect is, of course, a reflection of our common morality.

We recognize that we all share responsibility for each other's security.

At the same time, there must be a determination of responsibility for adverse events.

In this context, the army, seeking to avoid sole responsibility for reverses, wants a popular government to take charge of policy.

A broad pattern of self insurance caused by underinvestment in resilient infrastructure is an inefficient and distinctly inferior option.

The Oversight Committee will have an overall responsibility for ensuring compliance with these requirements.