Do you consider the eating of oysters to be moral... and the eating of snails to be immoral?

Is it still ethical?

and his crew is morally and legally entitled

Netanyahu s project is not moral.

We are not corrupt or morally decayed.

Is this or that still ethical?

I believe there's an evolved morality.

No, but it carries moral weight.

They make the moral mistake of seeing profits, and not people.

People find these to be more morally abhorrent if they've been reminded to wash their hands.

We are, should be, morally committed to being the healer of the world.

The protection of civilian populations is a moral imperative for the international community it is a collective and shared responsibility.

He emphasized that it was invidious to the peoples of the world for supposed security to rest on a morally repugnant nuclear balance of terror.

Poverty is not just ethically inadmissible its very existence endangers democracy at home and peace abroad.

This is not because markets are morally superior, though they do require freedom of choice to function effectively.

For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the users' freedom.

So the numbers are rising if we add a lottery, let's hear from one of you for whom the lottery would make a moral difference why would it?

Finally, isn't it interesting how we choose to stand with some causes more than others. I don't know if it is ethical to do so or not?

The contemporary world is not content with a capable State it demands a State that is responsive, accountable, transparent and ethically upright.

How do we know what to do with all the power we have if we don't have a moral framework?

It's called stealing or piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a ship and murdering its crew.

They are not against representative democracy as such they just want different representatives people whom they consider morally pure.

The United States had no moral right to lecture Cuba about human rights or democracy or combating terrorism.

leading Carl Malamud, who of course is famous for his Public Resources site, to tweet in the following way

For them, the key to international power was political power, and the central attribute of political power was a morally informed leadership.

If we lead lives where we consciously leave the lightest possible ecological footprints, if we buy the things that are ethical for us to buy and don't buy the things that are not, we can change the world overnight.

Humanitarian intervention action that is motivated by our concern for the fate of fellow human beings is often described as reflecting moral concern.

My values can be radically different from your values, which means that what I consider moral or immoral based on that might not necessarily be what you consider moral or immoral.

It is ethically and morally wrong and offensive to human dignity to create and then destroy human beings for the sole purpose of fostering the well being of other human beings.

It was regrettable that human rights were less a moral concern than a political one and were used as a means of pressure.

What I think is important is that, if it's clear that we exterminated these species, then I think we not only have a moral obligation to see what we can do about it, but I think we've got a moral imperative to try to do something, if we can.

The only thing that a morally awake person can do when the worst thing that's ever happened is happening is try to change those odds.

Humans are born with the capacity to be moral, but it is a limited capacity which is ill equipped to deal with the ethical complexities of the modern world.

Bioethical frameworks provide valuable, and often human rights compatible moral guidance to health professionals relating to their professional conduct.

And what is interesting about him in relation to morality is that he lived at a time where religion's influence was waning, and he was sort of wondering, I think, what would happen with society if there was no religion or if there was less religion.

No. What we saw, instead, was a moral surge among the French an act of self defense by the body politic.

Nearly 120 years ago, Winston Churchill described the futility of warfare in the region Financially it is ruinous. Morally it is wicked.

For Greeks, Italians, and many French, evading taxes is a kind of national pastime, which some even perceive as a moral duty.

In both practical and ethical terms, it is inadmissible to sacrifice the human race by madly invoking a socio economic model whose destructive capacity is dramatically rising.

Our policies, as indicated in the report on the world social situation, must be restructured, as they are creating or promoting trends that are morally and politically unacceptable.

In conclusion, we believe that, with renewed strength, the family the basic social unit of society  should provide the tools for the development of a morally upright and economically stable, healthy and viable society.

There will be times when nations acting individually or in concert will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified.

We therefore believe that there is both a moral and a legal responsibility to protect to protect vulnerable populations from violent conflicts that continue to claim the lives of many innocent civilians while leaving many more permanently displaced.

We might decide at that point that even though geo engineering was uncertain and morally unhappy, that it's a lot better than not geo engineering.

The first was moral, that psychologists and psychiatrists became victimologists, pathologizers, that our view of human nature was that if you were in trouble, bricks fell on you.