Did you have an argument?

It is an argument about the future.

But this argument neglects an important point.

Such an argument is not difficult to make.

This is not an argument against transformational leaders.

Holocaust denial is not an argument about the past.

Sami stormed out of the house after an argument with Layla.

It is an argument for fiscal insurance running in both directions.

The intellectual and political merits of such an argument are obvious.

Nor is this an argument against transformational leaders in US foreign policy.

He proposes that the context of a dialogue determines whether a circular argument is fallacious if it forms part of an argument, then it is.

That is an argument around which all conservatives should be able to rally.

There arose an argument among them about which of them was the greatest.

How is the possibility that a government might be forced into radical fiscal consolidation an argument for taking that step immediately, under no duress and before the recovery is well established?

Avshalom Adam makes an interesting argument, comparing the teacher's dilemma to that of Socrates

And an early test which argument elicited cooperative behavior from the people below about a hundred to one decided that this was the argument that worked best on us.

Inventor Dean Kamen lays out his argument for the Segway and offers a peek into his next big ideas .

This is not an argument for drift. Neglect in the Middle East is rarely benign.

To be effective, elections must be preceded by an extensive period of debate and argument.

11.16 The author rejects the State party's argument that he is requesting an inappropriate remedy.

Clinton was able to combine a sense of theater with narrative stories and an overall ability to convey an argument.

This is based upon the argument that while sovereignty gives rights to states, it also comes with a responsibility to protect its citizens, an argument based upon social contract theory.

Bad argument

It dignifies an argument and those to whom it is addressed to set it out thoughtfully.

This is not an argument that should encourage anyone to go out and buy a Hummer.

This argument is inadmissible prevention is an integral and important part of any functioning security system.

That s the argument.

And same argument.

However, there is an underlying argument about logistics, which has driven so much of this debate. Right?

Read an extended version of this argument in J. Bradford DeLong s blog post, Barbers on the March.

That's another argument for why we need to step into the lab and really measure the impact of technology on the brain.

A formula is valid if and only if it is true under every interpretation, and an argument form (or schema) is valid if and only if every argument of that logical form is valid.

On the face of it, it seemed to be this debate about the golf cart an argument about fairness, what's an unfair advantage.

In essence, this is an argument that the war was justified as a means of promoting human rights.

The argument that the crisis stems from the eurozone not being an optimal currency area is similarly flawed.

There was an old argument for Greenspanese voters or politicians or both are inherently short sighted and myopic.

that he may warn him who is alive and establish an argument against those that deny the Truth .

When he had said this, an argument arose between the Pharisees and Sadducees, and the assembly was divided.

Misusing the Inaction Argument

Neither argument is persuasive.

The World Bank estimates that this policy has driven at least 30 million more people into hunger. To cite policy driven famine as an argument for more of the same policy seems unreasonable, to say the least.

Biochemist Gregory Petsko makes a convincing argument that, in the next 50 years, we'll see an epidemic of neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer's, as the world population ages. His solution more research into the brain and its functions.

The intellectual and political merits of such an argument are obvious. The current administration cannot afford to walk into the trap set by Cheney, and be held responsible for another possible terrorist attack just because it abolished torture.

A comparison is not an argument. And the meaning of a slogan does not reside entirely in its genealogy.

I have questions with the values of Newtonian science, like rationality. You're supposed to be rational in an argument.