2.7 The first author submitted a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights.

Subsequently, the coordinator of the group submitted a complaint to the Provedor for Human Rights and Justice.

4.1 In June 2001, the State party submitted a request for advice on whether the complaint was ongoing .

1.1 The complainant, Mr. Mafhoud Brada, a citizen of Algeria, was residing in France when the present complaint was submitted.

Having concluded its consideration of complaint No. 223 2002, submitted to the Committee against Torture by S.U.A.

4.6 On 14 April 2003, the State party submitted its comments on the merits of the complaint.

The Secretary General, when necessary, may request clarification from the complainant of a complaint as to his her wish to have his her complaint submitted to the Committee for consideration under article 22 of the Convention.

Having concluded its consideration of complaint No. 221 2002, submitted to the Committee against Torture by Mr. M.M.K.

Having concluded its consideration of complaint No. 218 2002, submitted to the Committee against Torture by Mr. L.J.R.C.

4.1 On 15 January 2003, more than three years after the Committee informed it of the complaint, the State party submitted its observations on the admissibility and merits of the complaint.

4.1 On 10 April 2003, the State party submitted its observations on the admissibility and merits of the complaint.

4.2 By letter dated 28 May 2003, the State party submitted its comments on the merits of the complaint.

4.1 On 29 April 2003 the State party submitted its observations on the admissibility and merits of the complaint.

The Lithuanian competition agency received a complaint that the bids submitted by three companies to supply information technology and equipment to a government agency were suspiciously similar.

4.1 On 2 April 2003, the State party submitted its observations on the admissibility and the merits of the complaint.

3.6 The author states that the complaint has not been submitted to any other procedure of international investigation or settlement.

The complaint should be submitted by the individual himself herself or by his her relatives or designated representatives, or by others on behalf of an alleged victim when it appears that the victim is unable personally to submit the complaint, and, when appropriate authorization is submitted to the Committee

2.6 The authors add that a complaint similar to the one submitted to the Committee was presented in March 1998 to the Inter American Commission on Human Rights.

5.1 As to the admissibility of the complaint, the complainant maintains that the evidence submitted fulfils the minimum standard of substantiation that it is required in order to make the complaint compatible with article 22 of the Convention.

The Committee may revoke its decision that a complaint is admissible in the light of any explanations or statements thereafter submitted by the State party pursuant to this rule.

Will anyone lodge a complaint?

As both complaints were submitted by the same counsel, the present complaint places an unnecessary burden both on the Committee and the State party.

According to the Gender Equality Act burden of proof has been partially placed upon a person against whom the application, complaint or petition about discrimination based on sex is submitted.

There is, in the State party's view, no reason why the present complainant could not have been included in the first complaint submitted in December 2001.

Since the conciliation procedure is not mandatory, the party against whom the complaint is submitted does not have an obligation to take part in the procedure.

(a) That the complaint is inadmissible and

(a) That the complaint is inadmissible and

4.3 On 23 January 2003 the State party submitted its observations concerning the merits of the complaint, affirming that there had been no violation of the Covenant.

A model complaint form has been widely distributed via the focal point network and local NGOs a hotline has been established for confidential reporting, supplemented by an e mail complaint system and a mailing address for complaint forms.

The complaint

Lawyers acting on behalf of Mr. El Derini also submitted a second and third complaint to the Office of the Prosecutor General on 14 September and 27 December 2004, respectively. No response was received.

They lawyers are preparing to file a complaint.

He filed a formal complaint of abduction with us, do you understand? After receiving a formal complaint we are responsible for conducting an investigation.

On May 19, the mayor of Mejillones and various representatives of artisanal fishermen submitted a complaint to the Environmental Crime Brigade, demanding an investigation into the causes of the high death rates among marine species.

Encourage complaint submission.

Having concluded its consideration of complaint No. 222 2002, submitted by Mr. Z.E. under article 22 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,

The State party refers to the complaint submitted by the same counsel on behalf of the complainant's wife in December 2001, where it was argued that her situation was so closely linked to that of the present complaint that it was impossible to argue her case without referring to his.

The person against whom the application, complaint or petition is submitted then has to explain that his or her behaviour has been motivated by some other acceptable reasons than gender identity.

Optional non participation of a member in the examination of a complaint

At the time the complainant submitted his case to the Committee, i.e. more than 23 months after the submission of the criminal complaint, no response had been received from the Public Prosecutor.

4.5 Furthermore, within the framework of the proceedings concerning the complaint by the complainant's wife, the same extensive information has been submitted concerning his past activities, present whereabouts and conditions of detention.

7.1 The Committee considered the admissibility of the complaint at its thirtieth session and declared the complaint admissible in a decision of 29 April 2003.

Another remedy available to him would have been a constitutional complaint.

2.2 The company lodged a complaint against the author for misappropriation.

On the date that the complaint was submitted to the Committee, the appeal to the Bordeaux Administrative Court of Appeal against the judgement upholding the order to deport the complainant was still pending.