At the request of the representative of Romania a recorded vote was taken on the proposed amendment to paragraph 13. The amendment was rejected by 36 votes to 5, with 11 abstentions.

At the request of the representative of Canada, a recorded vote was taken on the amendment to paragraph 5 of the draft resolution. The amendment was rejected by 49 votes to 2, with 2 abstentions.

At the request of the representative of the Russian Federation, a separate and recorded vote was taken on the amendment to the fifth preambular paragraph of the draft resolution. The amendment was rejected by 25 votes to 21, with 7 abstentions.

At the request of the representative of Brazil, a recorded vote was taken on the amendment, which was rejected by 51 votes to 1, with 1 abstention.

At the request of the representative of the Russian Federation, a separate and recorded vote was taken on the amendment to insert a new paragraph after paragraph 1 of the draft resolution. The amendment was rejected by 26 votes to 13, with 14 abstentions.

Amendment

At the request of the representative of Australia, a recorded vote was taken on the proposed amendment, which was rejected by 35 votes to 7, with 11 abstentions.

At the request of the representative of Australia, a recorded vote was taken on the proposed amendment, which was rejected by 35 votes to 7, with 11 abstentions.

At the request of the representative of Cuba, a recorded vote was taken on the amendment deleting paragraphs 18 to 21, which was rejected by 39 votes to 14.

Proposed amendment by the European Community for expedited amendment of the Montreal Protocol

Revision and amendment

Amendment and revision

Article 1 Amendment

Amendment of Rules

Where, however, the adoption of one amendment necessarily implies the rejection of another amendment, the latter amendment shall not be put to the vote.

When an amendment to a proposal is moved, the amendment shall be voted on first.

When an amendment to a proposal is moved, the amendment shall be voted upon first.

No amendment was proposed.

Reservation, withdrawal and Amendment

3 Any state party may present a request to amend this Covenant through a written notice the amendment will only enter into force with the approval of two thirds of the OIC Member States.

At the request of the representative of Pakistan, a recorded vote was taken on the amendment to paragraph 9 of the draft resolution, which was rejected by 35 votes to 9, with 8 abstentions.

Draft decision XVII L Proposed amendment by the European Community for expedited amendment of the Montreal Protocol

As of 10 June 2005, 190 Parties had ratified the Vienna Convention, 189 had ratified the Montreal Protocol, 177 had ratified the London Amendment, 166 had ratified the Copenhagen Amendment, 130 had ratified the Montreal Amendment and 92 had ratified the Beijing Amendment.

The amendment did not pass.

Amendment (A 60 L.35)

The amendment read as follows

The amendment read as follows

Amendment relating to financial disclosure

At the request of the representative of Pakistan, a recorded vote was taken on the proposed amendment to paragraph 5 of the draft resolution, which was rejected by 25 votes to 20, with 7 abstentions.

At the request of the representative of Canada, a recorded vote was taken on the amendment to delete paragraph 20 of the draft resolution, which was rejected by 36 votes to 5, with 10 abstentions.

As of 5 October 2005, there were 190 Parties to the Vienna Convention, 189 Parties to the Montreal Protocol, 179 Parties to the London Amendment, 168 Parties to the Copenhagen Amendment, 134 Parties to the Montreal Amendment and 97 Parties to the Beijing Amendment.

At the request of the representative of Canada, a recorded vote on the proposed amendment to paragraph 17 (h) of the draft resolution was taken, which was rejected by 25 votes to 14, with 13 abstentions.

(ii) Amendment (A 60 L.35)

Amendment to the Committee's rules of procedure

Amendment of, and exceptions to, Staff Rules

Amendment to proposal by the Mexican Delegation

(a) Italy had ratified the Beijing Amendment

Cuba amendment to draft resolution L.85

With that request, the Government of Belarus sought to define its quantified emission reduction commitment as 95 per cent of the 1990 level, and to raise the issue of introducing a corresponding amendment to Annex B of the Protocol.

Penal Code (Amendment) Act No. 17 of 2003.

Amendment to the annex to the financial regulations.

Russian Federation amendment to draft resolution L.88

and requested a separate vote on each amendment.

Amendment to the annex to the financial regulations.

Proposed adjustment and amendment of the Montreal Protocol