2.8 The petitioner argues that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

2.4 The complainant argues that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

Shall he who argues contend with the Almighty? He who argues with God, let him answer it.

In Proposition 18 he argues that there are no further convex regular polyhedra.

Chinkin argues that

He argues that this delay was not justified by the complexity of the case.

He argues that his work was in many respects similar to that performed by the regular workforce.

He argues that an example should be made of State officials found guilty of torture.

He argues however that the Charter only protects against State action, and not that of entities such as universities.

He argues that many African states have fallen into one or several development traps that are extremely difficult to escape.

He argues that this is possible and cites numerous examples of companies that are serving poorer markets effectively and innovatively.

He argues that he was denied the possibility to make phone calls during the last three months before writing to the Committee.

He argues that, ultimately, any discrimination can be undone by downgrading the position of the group that is treated more favourably.

Indeed, he argues that same or similar enforcement problems of human rights legislation in Ontario are continuing and increasing .

Further, he argues that the Board did not question his information about what he was subjected to or what happened to him in Bangladesh.

He argues that these features of human memory are not necessarily bad, and that they actually serve a useful purpose in memory.

If Greece can t do better than this, he argues, then it should leave.

In any event, counsel argues that the complainant's present condition does not establish how he was treated in the past.

Then he argues that last year the lamb had called him bad names (but the lamb was only six months old).

Accordingly, it argues that these expenses are not compensable.

He argues that economists became blind to catastrophic macro failure because they mistook the beauty or elegance of theoretical models for truth.

He argues that in practice, judges consult or confer with other substitute judges who are also lawyers at the DBB law firm.

He argues for a Europe à la carte, at least for those outside the eurozone.

He argues that as there were only questions of law before the appellate courts, he did not make arguments on sufficiency of facts. He goes on to refer to Pezoldova v.

6.3 The author argues that he was an outspoken critic of the present Ugandan government during his time in Denmark and that he participated in conferences, where he protested against Uganda's treatment of political opponents.

Farideh Gheyrat, a jurist, argues that her arrest is illegal.

Yazan argues that the anti SOPA blackouts were quite effective.

Al Wazir also argues that not all Zaidis are Houthis.

It argues that the author has not exhausted domestic remedies.

Additionally, Pereyra argues

He argues that almost everywhere, whether Asia, Africa or Europe, before 50,000 years ago all the stone tools are much alike and unsophisticated.

6.2 The author argues that the current proceedings before the Federal Court raise different issues and cannot grant him the remedy he seeks.

Some even questioned the video s purpose, concluding that Banksy tackled an issue that he does not understand enough about, argues Lebanese satirist Karl Sharro on PRI.

He also argues that the complaint meets the admissibility requirements and recalls that torture is routinely practised in Bangladesh, as documented in well known NGO reports.

Referring to previous cases decided by the Committee, he argues that it is of no relevance that a remedy he might obtain under the Optional Protocol might benefit others in his community.

Among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge , and follows every defiant devil .

Among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge , and follows every defiant devil .

The ADB argues that other agencies are responsible for social development.

However Ribot argues that privatization is not a form of decentralization.

He argues that online social media can be an important space for sharing stories that the mainstream media fails to report, or shows no interest in discussing.

Although the author concedes that police patrols did pass by his house he argues that this is insufficient protection from an attempted kidnapping and possibly attempted murder.

By reference to the Committee's jurisprudence, he argues that his immediate expulsion from Denmark would render examination of his communication by the Committee moot.

In relation to the Ombudsman, he argues that although his her function is to conduct investigations of administrative action, the function is rarely used.

He also argues that the procedures are ineffective as legal costs make them prohibitively expensive. He argues that lodging and pursuing a complaint without a lawyer is not a practical option , that legal aid is not available for complaints, that some costs awards by the courts are unreasonable and could be punitive , and that deduction of legal costs for income tax purposes is not allowed.

He argues that he should have been treated equally with the privileged group of taxpayers which had been exempted from the additional 4 per cent increase of the taxable income.