Shall he who argues contend with the Almighty? He who argues with God, let him answer it.

2.8 The petitioner argues that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

2.4 The complainant argues that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

If Greece can t do better than this, he argues, then it should leave.

In Proposition 18 he argues that there are no further convex regular polyhedra.

He argues that this delay was not justified by the complexity of the case.

He argues for a Europe à la carte, at least for those outside the eurozone.

He argues that an example should be made of State officials found guilty of torture.

Additionally, Pereyra argues

Chinkin argues that

Among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge , and follows every defiant devil .

Among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge , and follows every defiant devil .

He argues that his work was in many respects similar to that performed by the regular workforce.

He argues that he was denied the possibility to make phone calls during the last three months before writing to the Committee.

And among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge , or guidance , or an enlightening scripture .

The source argues the following

Further, he argues that the Board did not question his information about what he was subjected to or what happened to him in Bangladesh.

Tactically, he argues, this is the only way for Al Qaeda to achieve its ultimate goal of taking power.

Indeed, he argues that same or similar enforcement problems of human rights legislation in Ontario are continuing and increasing .

He argues however that the Charter only protects against State action, and not that of entities such as universities.

He argues that many African states have fallen into one or several development traps that are extremely difficult to escape.

In any event, counsel argues that the complainant's present condition does not establish how he was treated in the past.

He argues that this is possible and cites numerous examples of companies that are serving poorer markets effectively and innovatively.

Then he argues that last year the lamb had called him bad names (but the lamb was only six months old).

He argues that, ultimately, any discrimination can be undone by downgrading the position of the group that is treated more favourably.

Roy Berman, from the Mutantfrog blog, argues

He argues that as there were only questions of law before the appellate courts, he did not make arguments on sufficiency of facts. He goes on to refer to Pezoldova v.

Algerian blogger Nouri argues why he doesn't think Lebanese born academician Fouad Ajami should not be an undersecretary in the US cabinet.

He argues that economists became blind to catastrophic macro failure because they mistook the beauty or elegance of theoretical models for truth.

He argues that these features of human memory are not necessarily bad, and that they actually serve a useful purpose in memory.

He argues that in practice, judges consult or confer with other substitute judges who are also lawyers at the DBB law firm.

He argues that almost everywhere, whether Asia, Africa or Europe, before 50,000 years ago all the stone tools are much alike and unsophisticated.

6.2 The author argues that the current proceedings before the Federal Court raise different issues and cannot grant him the remedy he seeks.

He argues that he should have been treated equally with the privileged group of taxpayers which had been exempted from the additional 4 per cent increase of the taxable income.

Accordingly, it argues that these expenses are not compensable.

If the Chinese do not pump aid into his crumbling economy, he argues, they will face refugees pouring across the border and possible unrest.

By reference to the Committee's jurisprudence, he argues that his immediate expulsion from Denmark would render examination of his communication by the Committee moot.

In relation to the Ombudsman, he argues that although his her function is to conduct investigations of administrative action, the function is rarely used.

6.3 The author argues that he was an outspoken critic of the present Ugandan government during his time in Denmark and that he participated in conferences, where he protested against Uganda's treatment of political opponents.

Then he argues that these revised theories coincide with a particular form of consequentialism, which is a theory in the same broad family as utilitarianism.

He thus again argues that it would not be appropriate to require him to pursue such an avenue and delay a petition to the Committee.

He argues that this is contrary to his right to be informed of the nature and cause of the charge against him (art. 14, para.

He argues that recent attempts on his part to secure before the courts the production of additional relevant documents from the Commission have been rebuffed.

Referring to previous cases decided by the Committee, he argues that it is of no relevance that a remedy he might obtain under the Optional Protocol might benefit others in his community.

Farideh Gheyrat, a jurist, argues that her arrest is illegal.