During their interviews, the claim preparers denied that they fabricated or altered evidence to bolster a claim or assisted claimants without valid losses to fabricate claims.

A formula is valid if and only if it is true under every interpretation, and an argument form (or schema) is valid if and only if every argument of that logical form is valid.

The islanders would never be persuaded that Argentina's claim that the islands had been illegally occupied by the British for 170 years was valid.

The specified contact is not valid

Is that slogan more valid now?

How long is a license valid?

File is not a valid .desktop file

Profile flag 'debug' is no longer valid.

Thus, the distinction is valid in a European context.

The 6.30 p.m. version is the only valid one.

In addition, the entire body is a valid target area.

403.17 Client certificate has expired or is not yet valid.

If I testify about myself, my witness is not valid.

Additional information provided in the previous report is still valid.

That remains valid.

It doesn't appear to be a valid disc image or a valid cue file.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

A prefix code is a code with the prefix property there is no valid code word in the system that is a prefix (start) of any other valid code word in the set.

The European Court of Human Rights has stated repeatedly that compensation is a valid and effective domestic remedy, and the fact that use was not made of it would imply that the claim is inadmissible on the grounds that domestic remedies were not exhausted.

Those recommendations are still valid.

Number of valid ballots 157

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

The URL you entered is not valid, please correct it and try again.

The URL you entered is not valid, please correct it and try again.

On this reading, formula is valid if all such interpretations make it true.

Claim No. 5000462 is for damage to cultural heritage resources claim No. 5000467 is for damage to livestock resources and claim No. 5000303 is for public health damage.

The licenses for manufacturing, trading, collecting or displaying weapons are valid for 3 years, and the license for obtaining weapons is valid for 6 months, starting from the day when the license is granted.

The first claim unit is for terrestrial damage the second claim unit is for damage to intertidal shoreline habitats the third claim unit is for damage to marine subtidal habitats the fourth claim unit is for losses of wildlife resources the fifth claim unit is for economic and ecological losses related to fisheries resources and the sixth claim unit is for two other compensatory projects.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

didn't find any valid .deb archives

Number of valid ballot papers 31

This claim is problematic, however.

Well it turns out that the computer analogy is just as valid for emotion.

But is it all just a matter of opinion? Are all interpretations equally valid?

Its methodology is largely sound, its purposes are valid, and its findings are useful.

It's also written in your law that the testimony of two people is valid.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

That concern remains no less valid today.