The reason for the contradiction is straightforward.

There are two aspects to this paradox.

In doing so the doctrine is flawed by a contradiction.

China today is a contradiction.

What explains this seeming contradiction?

What explains this apparent contradiction?

One example of such contradiction relates to paragraph 8.

The reason for the contradiction is straightforward. Countries putting money on the barrelhead want assurances that their resources will not be used frivolously, and they want to know that they will be repaid.

The contrast with today is striking.

In fact, Mexican officials have contradicted each other quite glaringly on several occasions.

She would welcome clarification of that discrepancy.

This discrepancy can be seen clearly in the banking sector.

To state the obvious, this contrast between Germany and its neighborhood is very awkward.

Simply put, that contradiction is no longer relevant to the new Israel.

Global warming highlights this contrast.

I said 0 . This caused no little amusement in the audience.

But, insofar as the contradiction remains, the political objectives ought to take precedence.

If so, the contrast with the recent past could hardly be starker.

But since when have conspiracy mongers been hampered by contradiction? Indeed, they have historically been no more bothered by engaging in contradictions than in ignoring facts.

The contrast between conditions in Germany and Spain illustrates the problem.

This discrepancy between the US and Europe is not good news.

Total shareholder return (TSR) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) often seem completely divorced from each other.

The danger is that such a discrepancy can become a source of instability and conflict.

There may not be as much conflict between these two agendas as first appears.

The contrast between the killing of Bin Laden and the intervention in Libya illustrates the Obama Doctrine.

The contrast with what happened in Gujarat in 2002 is painful.

Louis Napoleon, himself encouraged this contradiction by being all things to all people.

All of this exposed the built in ambivalence in Davutoğlu s zero conflict policy.

The reason for this contrast is simple the US has Obama, and Europe has the welfare state.

That refusal is clearly the result of the structural ambivalence that now exists between the US and China.

How do we resolve the contradiction between our extreme morality and our blatantly immoral circumstances? asks the writer Uri Avnery.

Activists have highlighted the contradiction between announcing reforms and arresting citizens who vow to take part in them. Gab tweeted

The Caribbean Community (CARICOM), a region of small and vulnerable economies, has experienced this significant decrease in ODA. It is to be hoped that the appeal contained in the Secretary General's report will be heeded.

Do you understand?

Is that clear?

The reason is obvious.

At the other extreme is Mexico, where competition with China is fierce.

Instead, the extremes seem to be squeezing out the desire for modernization.

This is the exact opposite of a genuine zero conflict policy that aims to minimize tensions and enhance stability.

It is clear that he is guilty.

Am I clear?

Clearly, he's guilty.

That s exploitative.

The challenge is clear.

This is plainly wrong.