From this perspective, I sincerely urge all Member States to promote the implementation of the Global Programme of Action and thereby strengthen international cooperation.

Perspective is a very powerful thing.

Now some of this is a difference of opinion, and that's not my main complaint.

1 Vertical, Fixed Viewpoint

2 Horizontal, Fixed Viewpoint

3 Vertical, Variable Viewpoint

4 Horizontal, Variable Viewpoint

So, from the perspective of engineering, we can ask

Which backs up my point and shows he didn't even break a sweat when he said that.

This outlook is understandable, but shortsighted.

The alternative view suggests different remedies.

They have a point.

Egyptian blogger Zeinobia shares a similar thought

I'd prefer the technological viewpoint, a contact service.

Perspectives can change.

Perspectives can be altered.

I'm glad you take that view.

Portugal strongly rejects that view.

We do not share this view.

But when you shake it, you get Pakistan's perspective.

Shake it again, and you get the British perspective.

Now some of this is a difference of opinion.

looking at America from that point of view.

You hurried off in the opposite direction, I noticed.

And there, in full view of the entire populace,

And then measure the returns, both from a financial perspective and from a social impact perspective.

That remained the view of the majority of the organizations in CCAQ.

Two dangerous corollaries emerged from this view.

Many Chinese dissidents take the same view.

Mr. SUCHARIPA (Austria) supported that view.

But anyway, the point is still made.

Come and look at the view from this window.

In fact, the history of technology has repeatedly refuted this pessimistic view.

This is Sarkozy s major point.

The simplest examples from this point of view are the Eisenstein series.

From this point of view, there are two sources of public value 1.

This supports the view that investments in SMEs take as much if not more time to return a profit than less risky investments with a wider scope.

The EU s eastern enlargement provides conclusive evidence to support this view, and demonstrates how the EU s evolution has also encouraged a fundamental re conceptualization of sovereignty as something de territorialized and diffuse rather than static and unchanging.

The alternative view is more pragmatic and rules based.

That is a view that Americans should take to heart.

The real lie, in this view, is the claim of objectivity.

In those statements we explained the thinking underlying our suggestions.

We merely wish to say that we fully share that view.

But not so long ago, the view was very different

From a moral standpoint, there's no question at all.