But this would lead to an even greater tragedy.

It would be counterproductive.

All of this would slow the recovery, perhaps even causing it to stall.

In the absence of an exit mechanism, this would have catastrophic consequences.

Currently, however, it is downright counter productive.

That will exacerbate the banking crisis.

In the final analysis, such an approach would lead to the establishment of a new centre.

This, too, helps European growth.

Such over investment produces an inevitable collapse.

Either choice would have far reaching consequences.

That would lead to greater coordination and more dynamic participation.

This would eventually lead to a significant split between the PKP members.

This will not only delay the restoration of economic growth, but will also have dire political consequences.

Choosing the latter option would have devastating consequences.

As the misdeeds of banksters come to light, the system no longer seems fair.

This would avoid costly duplication of effort.

In a medical emergency, it can impose life threatening delays in care.

So one meeting tends to lead to another meeting and tends to lead to another meeting.

So one meeting tends to lead to another meeting, which leads to another meeting.

That should further reduce the tensions between India and Pakistan.

The fall in the capital inflow would therefore bring with it a fall in the trade deficit.

Such stabilization would also eventually stop further climate change.

This persecution will admittedly aggravate their difficult struggle, but they will naturally survive it.

Did they not understand, he argued, that this would lead to factory closures and social turbulence in China?

Member States should refrain from any military action that would aggravate tensions and could lead to the outbreak of war.

The extra cash in the economy raises prices.

Deepening economic recession is bound to catalyze political change.

This would, in turn, lead to fairness, goodwill and harmony in our relations.

Relief on the entire stock of debt was a long term solution that would lead to recovery.

The former would exacerbate the country s slowdown, and neither change is in the cards.

That will lead to double dip recession, even larger fiscal deficits, and runaway debt.

This fragments Europe s supposedly unified market.

There were no breaches of criminal or procedural law that would lead to an overturn of the conviction.

Failure to do so will lead to friction, confrontation or even military conflicts.

Since unemployment is low among the more highly qualified, higher demand for their services will lead to an increase in wages rather than an increase in employment.

But the inflation that accompanies it will produce a steeper and larger erosion of real wealth invested in nominal bonds.

Democrats oppose most nondefense spending cuts, arguing that reductions would cause the economy to contract.

But a sudden backward regression can lead to despair, which we feel today.

The third myth is that saving the poor will worsen the population explosion.

Because contracts are linked with each other, one default can trigger an avalanche of broken promises, making it possible to destroy virtually the entire web of formal and informal contracts which the market system requires for its functioning.

But not admitting it is bound to prove even more painful in the long run.

True, a steep and persistent collapse in earnings will erode wealth invested in stocks.

Implementation of this plan would not only give a boost to the rule of law, but also would enhance security and lead to better governance.

Reducing this to 20 would spark an impressive increase in demand and employment across many industries.

If Europe were only about gaining the upper hand, it would generate perpetual conflict.