Submission details

Surveillance of deliveries

(a) Controlled delivery?

Extradition shall be subject to the other conditions provided by the law of the requested State.

terms of delivery and payment

(c) the actual place of delivery is one of the optional places of delivery under the contract and is located in a Contracting State, or

The latter, however, refused to accept that his old letter of resignation had any validity, let alone that Terzić had the authority to dismiss him.

I have an appointment.

Grounds for refusing to extradite a person (article 493)

Applications for extradition were accepted in 12 cases.

Providing for a definition of delivery is not that easy.

Do you have an appointment?

Mennad has an appointment.

Time of the Review Conference

As previously reported (S 2004 908, para.

The Commission decided to include in its current programme of work one new topic, namely obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)

It declared that it would render cooperation on extradition on the legal basis provided under the Extradition Act of 1992 of Malaysia.

I signed the extradition papers.

Iraq and Kuwait are ready to undertake the handover.

Belarus stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and it would use the Convention as a basis for cooperation on the issues of extradition with other States parties.

Belgium stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Do you have an appointment with him?

Do you have an appointment, Sir?

We have an appointment with the decorator.

Postponement of the date of recess

However, in such cases, extradition will be subject to other conditions set forth in Qatari law, if the State of Qatar is the requesting State.

Azerbaijan stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it would use the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Cyprus stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Egypt stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Latvia stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Malta stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

The Russian Federation stated that, on the basis of reciprocity, it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Slovakia stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Spain stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Sweden stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

( 244) 430970

Only performed in the last rakat of a prayer.

(5) The offence for which extradition is requested is a military offence

Lesotho stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Myanmar stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Slovenia stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

South Africa stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Mutual legal assistance (art. 18, para.

Angola stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Jamaica stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Panama stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Paraguay stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) stated that the Convention would be taken as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition in relations between the Bolivarian Republic and other States.