C. Admissibility criteria

Consideration of admissibility

D. Admissibility criteria

Admissibility considerations

Observations on admissibility

Observations on admissibility

Comments on admissibility

Substantive issues Admissibility

Review of consideration of admissibility

The Committee's decision on admissibility

Decision of the Committee concerning admissibility

Decisions on inadmissibility

The Committee's deliberations concerning admissibility

The State party's submission on admissibility

C. Admissibility criteria 7 9 5

State party's observations on admissibility and merits

Comments by the State party on admissibility and the merits

State party's observations on the admissibility and the merits of the complaint

Decision on admissibility 9 March 2004

Observations of the State party on admissibility and merits

The authors' comments on admissibility and merits

The author's comments on admissibility and the merits

The State party's observations on admissibility and merits

Procedural issues Determination of the scope of the Committee's decision on admissibility

Procedural issues Non substantiation of claim for purposes of admissibility

Procedural issues Admissibility ratione temporis continuing effect

Observations of the State party concerning admissibility and comments of the authors

Procedural issues Inadmissibility ratione materiae

The State party's submission on admissibility and author's comments thereon

They are grievously short of funds.

State party's observations on admissibility and the merits and authors' comments

Procedural issues Substantiation of claim by author Admissibility ratione materiae

Author's comments on the State party's observations on admissibility and merits

Procedural issues Substantiation of claims by author Admissibility ratione materiae

State party's observations on admissibility and merits and author's comments

State party response on admissibility and merits and author's comments thereon

In its decision on the admissibility of the application, the European Court postponed a decision on the question

What China lacked was not demand for consumption goods, but a supply of high quality financial assets.

India is not about to become a second China it lacks both the means and the ambition.

It may be that the original admissibility decision in Issa is better understood as the application of such a principle.

They lack organization and strategy.

They also lack a vibrant civil society.

It also lacks any pigmentation in its skin.

The police however lacked basic equipment.

The facts averred manifestly show that the author has sufficiently substantiated his claim for the purposes of admissibility.