The Error of the War on Terror

The war on terror polarizes the world.

The Forgotten Side of the War on Terrorism

Russia u0027s Incompetent War on Terror

Pakistan is an active partner in the war against terrorism.

The fight against terrorism is also at stake.

The war on terror is an aberration.

The fight against terrorist financing is an essential part of the international fight against terrorism more generally.

The fight against terrorism cannot ignore human rights.

None of these characteristics apply here.

Winning the war on terrorism will require a combination of offense and defense.

We have a duty in the United Nations to join in the global war against them.

But continuing support for the war on terror makes it no less self defeating.

Detention without trial is counterproductive in the fight against terrorism.

Taken together, these factors ensure that the war on terror cannot be won.

The war on terror appears to be causing a surge in protectionism.

The war on terrorism cannot be fought in Afghan villages.

It is also key to the present war on terror in Southeast Asia.

In the fight against terrorism, the Strategy abandons the predominantly military viewpoint underlying the war against terror, and embraces a more significant role for the intelligence services.

But this can happen only when the US and Pakistani governments disengage from their war on terror.

Democracy is intrinsically messy, but it won t jeopardize Pakistan s partnership in the war on terror.

But we are committed to ensuring that asset freezing is an effective tool in the fight against terrorist financing.

A third weakness is that the war on terror concept lumps together different political movements that use terrorist tactics.

Against war and those against War.

Similarly, the US has become less safe since President Bush declared war on terror.

The War on Democratization

But, as in Colombia, the effort to militarize the war on drugs and the war on terrorism seems likely only to generate more disorder.

Ultimately, however, the war against terrorism could be won only through cooperation.

Unfortunately, like the Cold War, the current war on terror is likely to be a matter of decades, not years.

A Global Consensus Against Terrorism

The Right Fight Against Terrorism

An Intelligent War on Terror

Europe s Fight Against Terrorism

The Media War on Terror

What we are against is terror.

Whose War on Terror?

A comprehensive convention on international terrorism and a convention for the suppression of acts of nuclear terrorism were needed to strengthen the fight against terrorism.

Donald Rumsfeld, America s Secretary of Defense, recently spoke about the Bush administration s global war on terror.

This fact is unrecognized at home because the victims of the war on terror are not Americans.

Last year, with the stroke of his pen, Obama ended his predecessor s global war on terror.

Pakistan, they said, was as deeply engaged as their countries in the war against terrorism.

So what, then, needs doing? The first thing to do is to drop the metaphor of a war on terrorism.

We are against war.

We hope the US will change its war on terror paradigm and re think its conception of a global armed conflict against Al Qaeda.

President Bush recently drew an analogy between the current struggle against violent jihadi terrorism and the Cold War.