(3) To adjourn the debate on the item under discussion

(4) For the closure of the debate on the item under consideration.

30. Decides to remain seized of the matter and to continue the consideration of this item.

During the discussion of any matter, a member may move the adjournment of the debate on the item under discussion.

During the discussion of any matter, a member may move the adjournment of the debate on the item under dissuasion.

During the discussion of any matter, a representative may move the adjournment of the debate on the item under discussion.

During the discussion of any matter, a member may move for the adjournment of the debate on the item under discussion.

These are still under discussion.

94. Joel Gómez Carpio.

(c) To adjourn the debate on the question under discussion

(d) To close the debate on the question under discussion.

Term to search for when starting up

15. Decides to keep the item under continuous review.

A member may, at any time, move the closure of the debate on the item under discussion, whether or not any other member has signified his wish to speak.

A representative may at any time move the closure of the debate on the item under discussion, whether or not any other representative has signified his wish to speak.

Proposals regarding the adjustment of international humanitarian aid capacities are currently under discussion.

The Security Council agreed to keep this item under review.

The Security Council agreed to keep this item under review.

It follows that the racial discrimination in question is attributable to the State party.

A representative may at any time move the adjournment of the debate on the question under discussion.

Rule 25 A representative may at any time move the adjournment of the debate on the question under discussion.

It was within that context that the items under discussion were included in the Board apos s agenda.

A member may at any time move the closure of the debate on the item under discussion, whether or not any other member or representative has signified his wish to speak.

During the discussion of any matter, a member may move the adjournment of the debate on the item under discussion.

A member may, at any time, move for the closure of the debate on the item under discussion, whether or not any other member or representative had signified his or her wish to speak.

In the present case, the State party has not shown that any of these factors was present.

During the discussion of any matter, a representative may move the adjournment of the debate on the item under discussion.

Further steps are examined regarding the adding of positions open to women service in the IDF.

It would be worthwhile exploring the nature of the treaty in question, because it was an objective criterion facilitating the determination process.

(a) The nature of the ships in question (e.g., fishing boats, tankers, trawlers etc.)

We in southern Africa, including Mozambique, attach great importance to the agenda item under consideration.

In both these cases, however, the rights in question have still to be determined in precise terms by legislation.

A member may, at any time, move the closure of the debate on the item under discussion, whether or not any other member or representative has signified his wish to speak.

Indeed, by its resolution 48 26 of 3 December 1993, the General Assembly took note of the report of the Secretary General, which reflected the view of a number of Member States on the item in question.

Ten years ago, we identified 10 priority areas in the Programme of Action being considered today.

The Review Conference of 1995 recognized the consequences and complexity of the issues at hand.

Four research streams are being conducted a Nova Scotia population based survey, focus groups, secondary data analysis and caregiver portraits.

He wondered, however, whether it was desirable to embark on a codification of jus cogens as a by product of the topic under consideration.

At its forty fourth session, the Committee considered the item and decided to remain seized of the matter.

59. Mr. CARDENAS (Argentina) said the item under discussion was basically a result of the following circumstances.

The group made considerable progress in its first two sessions, although some substantial issues are still open.

However, for such a multidimensional and complex case as the one under review, the investigation cannot be considered complete as of now.

The fact that the language under discussion had been adopted in previous years did not make her delegation's arguments any less compelling.

That being the case, it could not be considered a global amount.

In both these cases, however, the precise extent of the rights in question has still to be determined by legislation.