Still, any delay could be enough to trigger a bank run in either country.

A year ago, the two countries did not even have ambassadors in each other s capitals.

But domestic politics in both countries stand in the way.

Today, the prospect of either country launching a nuclear attack against the other seems almost ridiculous.

Both governments now understand each other better, and the two countries interests are more aligned than they have ever been.

Although no Japanese emperor has visited India before, the bilateral relationship runs deep.

Much of what really goes on inside these two large countries is often left out.

This said, a US preventive strike at Iran s nuclear related installations is not in the interest of either country.

Currently, both countries economies are thrusting confidently forward both are thirsty for more and bigger markets.

But the story is repeated across the border in Pakistan, with serious consequences for both countries.

But some dubious assertions have, through constant repetition in recent, often breathless, accounts about the two economies, become part of conventional wisdom. Much of what really goes on inside these two large countries is often left out.

The diplomatic protocols awaiting ratification by the two countries parliaments have fallen victim to miscalculations on both sides.

No amount of increased American military effort is likely to offset the resulting lack of progress in weakening extremists in both countries.

But per capita meat consumption in the United States and Europe is still more than three times higher than in either country.

Brazil ended up alone with Turkey voting against the sanctions, and without anything to show for its mediating efforts.

But, given the two countries many serious bilateral problems, will either government really want to bind itself so closely to the other?

Despite the improved relations between the two countries, no further progress was made on the delineation of the land border between Indonesia and Timor Leste.

Moreover, both countries know it.

No one in our delegation was sure what to expect, given the uneasy relations between our two countries at the time.

As a result, both countries maintained their sovereignty claims.

The two countries have so much in common.

Each has their reasons for not being enthusiastic about the revolution.

Both countries are full members of the Group of 77.

But, for both countries, economic growth is not hurdle free.

A default by either of those large countries would have disastrous implications for the banks and other financial institutions in France and Germany.

But the manner in which they are growing is dramatically different.

Despite the signing of the treaty, relations between the two countries remained strained.

Isolationism would leave their citizens ill prepared to confront competition and their governments excluded from decisions that impact the global economy and trade.

He noted a number of characteristics common to both Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan both country visits had taken place at the invitation of the respective Government in both countries there was a political will to carry out reforms and in both countries some but not all authorities were open to international cooperation, which was essential.

But the two countries situations include fundamental differences, as do political Islam s prospects for renewal.

More over, Japan in particular was not especially wealthy in an international comparison, and neither country had deep or well developed capital markets.

Both countries together, however, must inaugurate the step towards economic union, which requires that both governments actually want that.

Today, the two countries are vastly different.

No better opportunity to end decades of bilateral hostility is likely to come along.

For more than 20 years, this mutually beneficial codependency has served both countries well in compensating for their inherent saving imbalances while satisfying their respective growth agendas.

The foreign ministers of the two countries met in Bali on 18 and 19 June to address issues related to the bilateral Commission for Truth and Friendship and their common border.

In both countries, representatives of each of these groups demand substantial political influence.

There was, of course, opposition within both countries to the deal.

A peace treaty exists between Jordan and Israel, adds the blogger

Nor is there any military estrangement between the two countries.

There are several dimensions to the bilateral relationship.

Bilateral trade is booming.

Both countries, the sleeping giants, were expected to awaken at some point from their slumber.

Finally, they should accommodate each other s core concerns.

So both countries maintained their claims to sovereignty.