less capital intensive that there's less money that's required

Less investment will mean less capital deepening.

Less than 50 per cent of equity ownership.

They'd let me keep it if it were something smaller.

It's true. I'm not just trying to get more.

Smaller space is going to make for smaller utilities save some more money there, but also a smaller footprint.

And then we asked them if they wanted to do the next sheet for a little bit less money and the next sheet for a little bit less money, and so on and so forth.

And if all we do is put money in and close our eyes it's not just that the money is wasted that's the least of the problems it's that the money is captured.

So 40 is the very least, and you can view that as the least amount of money that you would want, out of these comparisons, in your bank account, or the smallest amount of money.

There have been some increases in capital requirements but far short of what is needed.

And if all we do is put money in and close our eyes it's not just that the money is wasted that's the least of the problems it's that the money is captured.

And so, using patient capital money that they could raise early on, that actually got below market returns and was willing to go the long haul and be combined with management assistance, strategic assistance they've now created a company where they purchase from 7,500 farmers.

People did the first sheet, then we asked if they wanted to do another for a little less money, the next sheet for a little bit less, and so on and so forth.

Use more equity, and equity becomes less leveraged and less risky, which causes investors to demand lower returns to hold it, and again the overall financing cost remains the same.

You said money isn't an important factor for either of us, so why am I the one to take a hit?

The Working Capital Fund, less than one month apos s requirement of the regular budget, is today virtually depleted.

Most of the world apos s cities with the least draw on environmental capital are the ones which perform worst in development terms.

The latter course risks the worst of all worlds all of the costs of capital controls and all of the domestic policy complications from volatile capital flows, but few of the potential benefits of foreign capital.

Likewise, increasing the supply of money relative to a fixed amount of output will lead to a decline in the purchasing power of money, as each currency unit buys fewer goods.

Yet they command less than 10 of the capital available for investment in new enterprises.

That's less money spent on medicine which means more money for books and school uniforms.

And no single measure would do more to reduce global oil consumption than a sharp increase in the tax on gasoline in the country that consumes more of it than any other the US.

Like a lot of money... Like a lot of money.

They can take on more risk running a more highly leveraged business with less shareholder capital.

Lower, ever lower.

The promotion of JV led OFDI ensures that local capital also participates with Indian capital in the development process of host countries and this would be at lower foreign exchange costs.

A measure of the scant effectiveness of Albania apos s capital stock is provided by comparing the inverse of the marginal capital output ratio (MCOR) with that of the LDCs.

At one time, it was thought that since developing countries had less capital than more developed countries, merely supplying more capital would solve their problems.

This is too small a pool of money from which to achieve deficit reduction on the scale that the US will need in the years ahead.

India s ability to stave off the economic gales was helped by the fact that it is much less dependent than most countries on global flows of trade and capital.

SÃO PAULO Less than a decade ago, Brazil s economy faltered at the first sign of instability in international financial markets.

And that was a vision of a fist full of money (no less) travelling without visible agency, along by the wall at the corner of St. Michael's Lane.

(This may not have been a bad thing, since it turns out that large (net) borrowers in international markets tend to grow less rapidly than others.)

lot of money to people.

For Less Money

How much money?

A little spending money.

Piles of money!

For money.

Lots.

Auda will not come to Aqaba.

25,000 now.

less than

is smaller than

is less than