The response, mounted by the Bush administration and taken over by the Obama administration, was all of the above.

Both Wall Street s chieftains and the Obama administration already knew the truth.

That is what the Obama administration is attempting to do right now.

The Obama administration seems surprised and disappointed with high and rising joblessness.

Americans attitudes toward climate change have been transformed under the Obama administration.

Some advisors within the Obama administration reaffirmed the intelligence conclusions, while other top advisers in the Obama administration say they no longer believe the key finding of the 2007 National Intelligence Estimate.

The Obama administration appears to have failed to ask itself some basic questions.

The Obama administration should have tried and should still try an alternative approach.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration continues to pursue its plans for European missile defense.

The outgoing American administration froze 64 million of assistance, leaving a final decision on what to do to the new Obama administration.

The Obama administration needs to make this case more directly and forcefully to Congress.

The Obama administration committed itself to global leadership through civilian rather than military power.

A year ago, the Obama administration made major efforts to reach out to China.

That is the debate that the Obama administration is leading in the US today.

That is the debate that the Obama administration is leading in the US today.

Unfortunately, neither the Obama administration nor the Fed seems willing to face these realities.

The Obama administration has had a strong start with respect to the Middle East.

It is to be hoped that the Obama administration will adopt the opposite course.

The Obama administration considers both Iran and North Korea to be outside this category.

This is the approach still preferred by the Obama administration, despite its poor performance.

Indeed, Hamas leaders recently acknowledged sending messages to the Obama administration calling for dialogue.

As the Obama administration formulates policy towards Egypt and Yemen, it faces a dilemma.

The Obama administration also wants China to share more of the burdens of international leadership.

This is not to say that the Obama administration did not try to boost employment.

The Obama administration has, however, introduced a new concept too big to be financially restructured.

The Obama administration has been right not to appear too spooked by all of this.

Here again, a strong lead from the new Obama administration could have a beneficial effect.

In describing the New START Treaty, Obama administration officials stress the magnitude of the reductions.

Indeed, all Western governments, with the exception of the Obama administration, are committed to retrenchment and Obama cannot get a new stimulus package through Congress.

Yet the Obama administration continues to deny that China is at the center of its strategy.

The Obama administration says so, as does the Fed (albeit more prudently), and both act accordingly.

The US Federal Reserve and the Obama administration remain rhetorically wedded to maintaining a strong dollar.

(Remarkably, the Obama administration claims that veterans right to appeal to the courts should be restricted!)

The Obama administration therefore turned to fiscal policy tax cuts and a range of spending programs.

In 2009 Moss was sworn into the Homeland Security Advisory Council of the Barack Obama administration.

The Obama administration repeatedly denies such claims, along with others that the treaty s verification provisions remain insufficient.

And, tough talk notwithstanding, the Obama administration has yet to offer a credible roadmap for fiscal consolidation.

I think the Obama administration has succumbed to political pressure and scare mongering by the big banks.

Jerusalem is another on the ground issue that will be a litmus test for the Obama administration.

The Obama administration may believe that toughness directed at China will generate electoral support in the US.

This, more than anything else, explains the growing disconnect between Arab public opinion and the Obama administration.

The Obama administration has wobbled in this balancing act, but thus far it has not fallen off.

Spats have broken out between the Obama administration, future presidential contenders, senators, and arms control and defense experts.

The Obama administration has staked significant political capital on the wager that Myanmar s promise may finally bear fruit.

The Obama administration, including Clinton, initially portrayed these steps as part of a balancing act on Yanukovych s part.