The fifth F4 instalment includes a number of claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories.

Details of the claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories are discussed in the relevant sections of this report.

Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

If the funding is channeled through the IMF, and is to be treated on par with private debt, the Fund will need a guarantee from the EFSF or strong eurozone countries that it will be indemnified in any restructuring.

The claims relate to damage resulting from, inter alia

We need to rescue morality from the claims of science.

Categories of workers who are not protected by minimum wage laws or otherwise indemnified include those workers who were fired during the war on the basis of their ethnic origin.

With regard to claims for expenses resulting from public health expenditures, Iraq contends that there is no legal basis for such claims.

This claim unit was deferred from the second instalment of F4 claims.

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

16. Urges the Secretary General to give priority to the reimbursement of claims from liquidated missions, including maintaining adequate reserves to settle claims once certified

The present report sets out the Panel's recommendations for a fourthsecond group of overlapping claims from resolved E4 instalments (the fourthsecond group of overlapping claims ).

The Court held nevertheless that claims of non parties that derived from the main claims ought to be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration.

The Commission received information from the Governments of the Philippines, India and Jordan that claims, which they had submitted in category A , were potentially duplicate claims.

CATEGORY C PALESTINIAN LATE CLAIMS Recommendations for corrections to five category C Palestinian late claims have arisen from clerical errors, as reported in the following paragraphs.

Category D claims During the period under review, the secretariat reviewed a total of 334 requests from 10 Governments for corrections to claims in category D .

Category E claims During the period under review, the secretariat reviewed a total of 23 requests from two Governments for corrections to claims in category E .

Table 2. Recommended awards for claims for personal injuries resulting from landmine explosions

He claims that he was denied the right to appeal from this decision.

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

As the D1 Panel is not mandated to review claims of corporate entities, these losses were severed from the category D claims, and transferred to category E4 .

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Jordan ClaimS of the State of Kuwait Overview In the fifth F4 instalment, the Panel reviewed four claims submitted by Kuwait for damage resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Anas Hamra, from Gaza, claims he got his KFC after a seven hour wait

Claims

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Kuwait Claims of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Overview In the fifth F4 instalment, the Panel reviewed four claims submitted by Saudi Arabia for damage resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Saudi Arabia Claims of the Syrian Arab Republic Overview In the fifth F4 instalment, the Panel reviewed three claims submitted by Syria for damage resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Iran Claims of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Overview In the fifth F4 instalment, the Panel reviewed two claims submitted by Jordan for damage and losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Lima also claims that maritime limits should run diagonally south west from the land border.

With regard to the claims made for pain and suffering for non fatal injuries, the Claimants state that these are distinct from the government claims for reduced quality of life.

Duplicate claims

review of non overlapping claims in the FOURTHsecond group of overlapping claims

These E4 claims were considered in the second instalment of E4 claims.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

Where necessary and appropriate, the Panel requested additional information from the Claimants to clarify their claims.

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

Admissibility of claims

(e) Medical claims

Stand alone claims

Of the 24 company claims in this instalment, 19 are stand alone claims four are corporate detainee claims and one is an E2 claim.

As of the end of 2003, UNRWA had received no response from Israeli authorities regarding these claims.

CLAIMS OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Overview In the fifth F4 instalment, the Panel reviewed five claims submitted by Iran for compensation for damage resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

These claims have been recognized only between the countries making claims in the area.

The process claims were allowed by the Patent Examiner, while the product claims disallowed.

8.2 The State party notes that before the Norwegian courts, the authors' claims of exemption from the school subject named Christian Knowledge and Religious and Ethical Education were adjudicated in a single case, along with identical claims from three other sets of parents.