The prosecutor's indictment in that case stated that in March 2007 in Betasi, Taiboko the first defendant entrusted some traditional medicine to the second defendant to be given to the victim J and to be taken in accordance with instructions set out by the first defendant.

The defendant supplied three medical reports.

(a) The domicile of the defendant or

Authority Special court of Buga, Valle. Status defendant.

Moreover, whereas the defendant was not able to cross question her ophthalmologist, the author had the opportunity to cross question the expert proposed by the defendant.

The view was also expressed that the suggested mechanism for removal of actions could add to the litigation costs of the defendant since it could only be triggered by the first action, while reversing the mechanism to request subsequent plaintiffs to sue in the forum nominated by the defendant would be preferable.

(1.2.05) the Court imposed harsh punishments in spirit of the law the first defendant received a sentence of 13 year imprisonment and a sum of 25,000 NIS as compensation to be paid to each victim, the second defendant received a sentence of 6 years and 15,000 NIS to be paid as compensation to each victim.

Every victim was encouraged to tell his story and the defendant listened.

In C.C. 774 04 (14.3.05) The State of Israel v. Genadi Boslovitz et al., the first defendant was ordered to pay a sum of 15,000 NIS to each of the ten victims.

Hang Seav Heang, 28, described the defendant as a gentle man, a good father.

The lack of financial means in such cases could deny a defendant proper representation.

Genocide s stringent requirements mean that it is and should be difficult to convict a defendant.

The criminal law is applied retroactively only when this results in benefit for the defendant.

However, it appears that an indigent defendant cannot choose his own counsel at public expense.

The defendant was also allegedly subjected to discrimination and ill treatment by the prison authorities.

Once indicted, the defendant went to trial, sometimes on the same day, as in the case of the first person indicted and tried on June 2, Bridget Bishop, who was executed on June 10, 1692.

On 18 April 1978, however, the plaintiff and the defendant settled their dispute by signing an extrajudicial agreement, according to which the defendant would pay 300.000.000 Argentinean pesos to the plaintiff, a payment that was effected on 28 April 1978.

The news article painted the defendant as a guilty man, even though he had been proven innocent.

The defendant had no legal counsel (legal assistance and legal representation were allowed in civil cases only).

The defendant sought to have the suit removed to Belgium, arguing that Ontario was forum non conveniens.

In C.C. 1237 02 the State of Israel v. Vladimir Vaba Ben Nison Chaimov et al. (15.6.04) the Court ruled that 15,000 NIS should be paid to 2 victims by one defendant, and 7,500 NIS to the other 4 victims by each defendant.

Supporters of the defendant protest outside Hà Nội People s Court. Signs say Freedom and justice for Cấn Thị Thêu .

Any decision arising out of a proceeding during which the defendant had not had legal counsel was considered invalid.

(a) The principal place of business or , in the absence thereof, the habitual permanent residence of the defendant or

Making use of this privilege, the prosecutor asked one of the authors to give a statement as a defendant.

(a) The principal place of business or, in the absence thereof, the habitual residence of the defendant or domicile or

The aim of the bar ( barrister присяжный поверенный ) was to guarantee that each defendant would have access to qualified legal assistance.

A defendant had the right to legal representation at all stages of the trial and within 24 hours of being detained.

The defendant could also be represented in court by a family member or a representative of, for example, a trade union.

Judgement was pronounced, in absentia, against the defendant and assets were seized from Mr. Haidera's Merrill Lynch account in New York.

According to the source, no defendant can rely on an interpreter employed by and working for those seeking to prosecute him.

In the South African proceedings the most important question was not the future of the defendant but the past of the victims.

One acquittal was overturned, resulting in the conviction of one defendant of crimes against humanity, while the other four cases were dismissed.

2. If the carrier or maritime performing party institutes an action under this instrument against the shipper or other cargo interest, then the claimant, at the petition of the defendant, must remove the action to one of the places referred to in articles 72 or 72 bis, at the choice of the defendant.

And so, I think of what I'm doing not so much as studying the defendant in a criminal trial, but studying the jury.

Subject matter Right to request the summons of an expert on the same terms as the defendant in an action under labour laws

The first defendant received a sentence of 14 years imprisonment, 2 years of suspended imprisonment, a sum of 15,000 NIS as compensation to be paid to each of the ten victims, a fine of 50,000 NIS or alternatively 6 months imprisonment, and confiscation of 200,000 NIS.

All they seem to agree on is the colour of the car, which is not in fact Ali's, but belongs to a co defendant.

Similarly, in C.C. 212 01 the State of Israel v. Mordechai (8.2.05) the Court imposed 12 year imprisonment on the defendant for trafficking charges.

The second defendant was sentenced to 10.5 years imprisonment, 1.5 years of suspended imprisonment, a fine of 20,000 NIS or alternatively 3 months imprisonment.

As for sexual harassment beyond the workplace, if the act is considered a rape, the defendant must be punished according to the Criminal Law.

Mubarak was not originally a defendant in the case and prosecutors did not add him to the case until two months after it was filed.

The prosecutor made use of this privilege to request, as an additional proceeding, the taking of a statement from one of the authors as a defendant.

The author concludes that her right to equality before the courts was infringed because she was unable to submit evidence on the same terms as the defendant.

Accordingly, in the light of the charges brought against the defendant and the length of time he spent in custody, his pretrial detention does not seem disproportionate.