Then you could solve for that bj.

And then you could solve for c.

You could also solve this by grouping.

So you could use the quadratic equation to solve this.

And to solve this, 4 times something is 36, you could solve that probably in your head.

You can set y equal to 0 and then you could solve for it.

And then we could solve this equation.

And here you could try to solve this situation, but there's just a pattern here that you could actually identify immediately.

You could assume it's just a function of y and try to solve it.

And to solve for YZ was bunch of ways that you could do it

And, basically, none of them could solve it.

So we could actually solve for that term.

And you know how to solve this one, but I just want to show you, with a fairly straightforward differential equation, that you could solve it with the Laplace Transform.

Money could not solve the problem then, did not solve it when it went to court, and will not solve it now.

Mind you, the idea that the ultra rich could easily solve poverty is stupefyingly naïve.

If x was 0, this would cancel out and you could just solve for y.

Look, there's a problem which I could not solve 25 years ago, and which nobody can solve.

And negative b is we could just solve it.

I could solve a lot of my family's problems.

So we could use that to solve for C.

And if it seems far fetched that tobacco plants could make people healthy, what about gamers that could solve problems that experts can't solve?

You actually just tend to ask what the limit is, and this is the way you could solve it.

If you don't understand what I'm saying you could kind of solve it with the traditional method, cross multiply.

Well, let's see what kind of problems we could solve.

But we could also solve for it algebraically right here.

So we could solve we multiply both sides by 100.

And by the way, if you could find products that solve needs, your total available market as you'll see later is huge compared to I solve specific problems.

Now this might look like you could solve it pretty easily, but that x squared term messes things up and you could try it out for yourself.

So you still could solve for y, but this expression right here, or this equation, defines y implicitly.

How could she give me such a tough problem to solve?

How do you solve it?

So you solve a quadratic.

How do you solve that?

I mean, if you had to solve one of these problems, Chris, which would you solve?

Now let's solve for, essentially you can only solve for your pivot variables.

The final problem that David knew he could not solve was death.

The Fund could solve this dilemma by applying an insurance like approach.

I think they actually teach this in Algebra 2 you could at least, if the teacher asks you, solve for the matrix of minors or the cofactors or solve for the determinant of the inverse, you can do it.

How did you solve the problem?

You essentially solve the homogeneous equation.

How do you solve this problem?

It's important because if you solve these problems, you can solve the problems of poverty in the world.

We could solve our energy problems we can reduce CO2, we could clean up our oceans we could make better wine.

I mean, if you had to solve one of these problems, Chris, which would you solve? Terrorism or poverty?

And David found that there were many problems that technology could not solve.