The Migration Board rejected counsel's request for such a delay.

On 2 September 2002, the Appeal Aliens Board upheld the Migration Board's decision.

Before the Migration Board, he did not produce any medical evidence at all.

On 2 September 2002, the Aliens Appeals Board dismissed the appeal, endorsing the assessment made by the Migration Board.

On 27 March 2001, the Migration Board denied his application.

The State party relies on the opinions of the Migration Board and the Aliens Appeal Board.

2.7 Before the Aliens Appeals Board, the complainant contested the findings of the Migration Board.

4.2 The Migration Board interviewed the complainant on the same day.

On 24 September 2001, the Migration Board denied the application and ordered their expulsion.

If the Migration Board refers a case, it must first be forwarded to the Aliens Appeals Board which provides its own opinion on the case.

2.11 On 19 December 2001, the Migration Board denied his application.

During the first interview with the Swedish Immigration Board he asserted that he was not married.

Before the Migration Board, she claimed that her husband had disappeared 3½ years earlier and that she did not know where he was.

In the present case, the Migration Board took its decision after interviewing the complainant for three hours.

In the complainant's case, the Migration Board took its decision after conducting two comprehensive interviews with the complainant.

2.6 The complainant points out that the Migration Board did not dispute that she had been tortured and raped.

On 23 May 2001, the Migration Board sought the opinion of the Swedish Security Police on the case.

2.2 On 19 June 2001, the Swedish Migration Board dismissed the complainant's asylum application.

4.3 In a second interview with the Migration Board, the complainant provided a more detailed account of the above incident.

4.3 A second interview was held by the Migration Board on 20 December 2000 in the presence of the complainant's legal counsel.

4.5 On 21 February 2001, the Migration Board rejected the application for asylum and ordered the complainant's expulsion to Bangladesh.

In the Board's view, on the basis of the information before it, the complainant could be considered entitled to claim refugee status however, the Security Police's assessment, which the Board saw no reason to question, pointed in a different direction.

A debate on immigration is beginning in the United States Senate, which will take up several proposals.

The balancing of the complainant's possible need for protection against the Security Police's assessment thus had to be made by the Government.

4.4 On 19 July 2001, the Migration Board rejected the complainant's application for asylum and ordered that he be deported to Ecuador.

The complainant has described his political activities in detail before the Migration Board and the Aliens Appeals Board, and neither institution questioned his activities.

Strict immigration laws and anti migration policies, however, have virtually eliminated all forms of legal and safe migration.

Furthermore, the Migration Board, in making its assessment, did not have access to the medical evidence presented later in domestic proceedings.

2.13 On 6 August 2002, the Aliens Appeal Board upheld the decision of the Migration Board, arguing that it is easy to obtain false documents in Bangladesh and therefore they had to be considered of low evidentiary value.

On 15 July 2004, the State party conceded that the author has exhausted domestic remedies, after his appeal against the decision of 19 January 2004 of the Danish Immigration Service was dismissed by the Immigration Board on 28 June 2004.

Migration Realism

Migration and development

Taking Back Immigration

The Immigration Game

Migration

H. Migration

The State party submits that the fact that the complainant did not produce any medical evidence until his application was pending before the Aliens Appeals Board may indicate that his medical condition has deteriorated primarily as a consequence of the Migration Board's decision to reject his asylum application

While asylum claims are normally dealt with by the Migration Board and, in turn, the Aliens Appeals Board, under certain circumstances either body may refer the case to the Government, while appending its own opinion.

On 14 September 2001, the Migration Board held a major inquiry with the complainant, with a further inquiry following on 3 October 2001.

Europe s Migration Paralysis

आप रव स य र प क ल ए स अवसर

Migration s Hall of Mirrors

Migration Is Development

Immigration and American Power

Immigration law and practice