The Price Paradox

The Democracy Paradox

The Boston Paradox

The Paradox of Identity Politics

Today s Productivity Paradox

The Paradox of Blinking

And that is an important distinction.

How ironic.

And it's well illustrated by a nifty paradox known as the Baker baker paradox, which goes like this

Africa is a paradox.

There is more than a little irony here.

It is simply not possible.

Call this the paradox of enlargement.

They have no intention of parting with it.

This chap is determined to create a paradox.

So it's an interesting paradox at play there.

I think it's a tremendous contrast.

The result is a dangerous paradox.

This is something I call the 50 20 paradox.

The most famous one is usually called the grandfather paradox.

It's a paradox. It just doesn't make sense.

But there was a deep paradox in all of this.

The travel ban presents an apparent paradox.

I have a new, simpler version I call the mad scientist paradox.

That's why it's so ironic, what happened.

Another major objective is to resolve yet another paradox.

That outcome is as frustrating as it is ironic.

Morales s success rests largely on the paradox of populism.

There is s paradox in all this.

And it's ironic, because we're standing today in the Central Bank.

Still, a central paradox plagues the MDGs.

In that case, however, the Boston bombings appear to present a paradox.

Now social scientists call this the paradox of aging.

(I discuss them in more detail in my new book, The Globalization Paradox.)

WASHINGTON, DC South Asia presents a depressing paradox.

Situational irony is when you expect one thing, but get the opposite.

As a result, the vow of celibacy has become an unworkable anachronism.

But even here there is a paradox for the regime.

Of course, from a French perspective, the US role is somewhat ironic.

The paradox of fire stems from its role as the great shape shifter of natural processes.

America today presents the paradox of a rich country falling apart because of the collapse of its core values.

In an interdependent and globalized world, that is an anachronism that does not serve the purposes of the Organization.

It is our view that the veto power has now become untenable and anachronistic.

The paradox of our times is that, in a world that is growing ever richer in overall terms, poverty is on the increase.

In sum, testing is a dangerous anachronism in the post cold war era.