We are aware that his task is by no means an easy one, but he must succeed.

To continue that joint forward movement, we must all recognize realistic needs and responsibilities.

And finally, we must recognize that too many of these humanitarian crises result from a total absence of peace and security.

At the same time, we must also understand that, as we move towards the status process, tensions may rise.

We must understand that we are the potential, the solution, the force for change and I say must because young people and adults must understand what youth means it means potential energy, the solutions.

We must, however, realize and accept the fact that threats in today's globalized world recognize no boundaries.

In our effort to develop a workable outcome from our high level event and to speed our international development efforts, we must first recognize that this process is one of partnership.

But we must realize that their work and their lives are under increasing threat and that our operations can now be disrupted completely by renewed conflict any day, and anywhere, in Darfur.

We are fully aware that preparedness is necessary.

We know what must be done.

We now know that they are not.

Nor is there such a thing as a free war.

We see the importance of our work, but we also see its limits.

But you've got to realize that this world has changed fundamentally, and the problems that we have cannot be solved by one nation and one nation alone.

Now we see that countries far away have had very similar experiences.

It is easy to see why.

We knew our heroes would win.

We understand, however, that the world is changing, and changing quickly.

We realize that this is primarily the responsibility of the Ivorian people themselves.

First, markets need clear rules.

In the end, the alternatives to adjustment are not soft.

Through a responsible national dialogue, we have been able to reach agreement on a unilateral approach to promoting calm and we understand the need to continue that process. In that regard, we believe the elections will have a positive impact.

We must recognize, yet again, that we are all in this together.

But there is a critical difference between balancing and subservience.

It is easy to see how terrorism can lead to torture.

It is not hard to see why.

We understand that both sides have domestic concerns and demands to address.

But make no mistake both parties are implicated.

This possibility is at our fingertips.

Finally, policymakers are running out of tools.

But the point remains that ideas matter.

We must recognize that democracy has proved its worth around the world.

A country s most valuable resource is its people.

But we should be clear that these changes are not just tinkering at the edges.

We realize that reporting can be a strain on already limited administrative resources.

It is heart warming to recognize that the proposal enjoys widespread support among Member States.

The dilemma posed by China for democratic regimes is understandable.

Many of these pernicious side effects can already be perceived.

After all, we do know that it is our future.

In retrospect, this was a major mistake.

Second, it is important to recognize the limited logic and impact of transition.

Number two thing that Howard did is he made us realize it's another very critical point he made us realize in the importance of what he likes to call horizontal segmentation.

Recognizing that 2005 not only marks the sixtieth anniversary of the United Nations but will also see the five year review of the Millennium Declaration and the MDG 5 review of the Millennium Development Goals, as well as the holding of the World Summit on the Information Society, to which various events civil society should make an effective contribution,

But we must understand that Copenhagen is also a big chance to revive the global economy.

But in the end, the point isn t a battle over strategies.