There is little time to waste.

We cannot afford to let this opportunity pass us by.

We can t waste time, he says.

We Europeans cannot afford the luxury of dismantling a high value added industrial sector in which we still have a real comparative advantage.

The harsh reality thrown into stark relief by the Japanese disaster is that we do not yet have the luxury of dumping coal, gas, and nuclear power.

Indeed, perhaps the most important lesson learned in the aftermath of the collapse of Lehman Brothers is that we can no longer afford to examine problems in terms of individual institutions and from regulatory silos.

At the time, survival from death was a luxury.

We do not have the luxury of approaching the linked issues of arms control, disarmament, and non proliferation separately. In today s highly complex, interconnected world, we must consider all nuclear threats in a holistic way.

After the oil for food scandal, the Organization which is to say, all of us, Member States as well as those who have institutional responsibilities in the Organization cannot afford the luxury of another scandal that is much more serious and destabilizing than the oil for food scandal.

The international community cannot afford to postpone reform.

Zuma senses the urgency of the situation. He is, after all, 67 years old and likely to serve only a single term in office.

Europe is equally responsible for advancing research on more secure technologies, particularly a fourth generation of nuclear reactor technology. We Europeans cannot afford the luxury of dismantling a high value added industrial sector in which we still have a real comparative advantage.

We have no real alternative to the market, just as we have no real alternative to freedom.

Why do we have that belief?

Today, we have a choice.

As Norwegian social scientist Evelin Lindner has observed, Pessimism is a luxury of good times ...

He cannot lose any time in fulfilling that pledge.

Now we've got a movement.

We can only remember it.

We have the tools at hand to do this.

And we've got the mathematics to describe this process.

First of all, we have to have the right framework.

We do not.

We have the berber keyboard on our phones.

Today, we have the means to eradicate them.

We have the knowledge and the resources to do something about it.

We have tools to prevent armed conflicts.

We don t have answers to these questions.

We dare not look the other way.

I don't think we have enough time to do that.

We have the resources to win this war on want.

There is also a need to draw a distinction between natural disasters and terrorist disasters caused by man. The former are often uncontrollable.

And in 1945, we were the only nuclear power.

I really think that we, women, have an extra sense.

We can only hope that it does not catch on.

But solving it will take more than a generation, and Europe cannot afford to wait for economic recovery.

With near zero interest rates, most Western governments cannot afford not to borrow.

No state that aspires to win the support or cooperation of others can afford to be seen to be comfortable with unambiguous double standards.

But now we got Eagles out there, F15s, even that Bald Eagle.

We have significantly lower capital costs in our plant equipment.

We have not met before, but we share similar thoughts about the situation.

We have no idea really as to how it's achieving that movement.

We don't have enough money to buy everything we need.

It is obvious that, domestically, we do not have anything like such resources.

They are preventable, because we have the tools and the knowledge to prevent these deaths.