Ref.

There had also been an improvement in the number of sessions with utilization over the benchmark and an improvement in meeting ratios and planning accuracy.

Frame of reference

Meeting planners continued to examine the reasons for any utilization below the established benchmark of 80 per cent.

Clarification was provided by the Secretariat regarding the organs whose utilization factor had been lower than the benchmark figure for the past three years.

Since 2004, however, the X.Org Server, a fork of XFree86, has become predominant.

The Committee decided to raise the minimum rate for utilization, the benchmark figure, of conference servicing resources to 80 per cent, pending further analysis of the expanded methodology.

So the first entries get added together, the second entries, the third, all the way down.

A request was made that consultations with representatives of bodies that had used their allocated resources at a rate below the established benchmark during the past three sessions should be held with the Committee as a whole.

(b) Terms of reference of the mechanism and frequency of its meetings

The terms of reference are set out in annex 1.

You almost have to mute your frame of reference.

The Committee also heard an oral report by the Chairman of the Committee on his consultations with bodies that had consistently utilized less than the applicable benchmark figure of their allocated resources for the previous three sessions.

23. Moreover, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 8 of General Assembly resolution 48 222 A, the Chairman of the Committee held consultations with the chairmen of organs concerned, where the utilization factor was lower than the established benchmark figure applicable for the last three sessions.

'Uh, one'....'one'.... 'one'. .......the volunteer answers, 'It's two'...... 'one'

'Three.....'three'.....three.... the volunteer answers 'three'.....'three'

Reference date 1 October 2003, with the exception of the WO figures for which the reference date is 31 December 2002

It doesn't come into my frame of reference.

If the benchmark figure of 80 per cent was not reached in the previous year, the Committee on Conferences will express its concern and make proposals for improvement.

9. Urges those bodies whose utilization factor is below the applicable benchmark figure for the last three sessions to review and consider reducing the amount of conference servicing resources requested

I have to do it with this number as well.

Reference approach estimates should preferably be taken from the Party.

Provisional terms of reference for the independent audit advisory committee

12. The Committee recommended to the General Assembly that it should invite those bodies whose utilization factor is below the benchmark figure for three sessions to review and revise, if necessary, the amount of conference servicing resources requested.

The Committee recommended to the General Assembly that it should invite those bodies whose utilization factor was below the benchmark figure for three sessions to review and revise, if necessary, the amount of conference servicing resources requested.

Number Two. Number Two. Two.

I shall dial the wrong number, this number.

Therefore the actual figure of 168,147 is in line with planned increases.

Survey reference date 1 April 2005

Because from my frame of reference, it looks completely identical

Either they're the same, or this one's bigger than this one, or this one's bigger than that one.

So just eyeballing it already, this number is close to this number, but this number is much larger than this number.

And this number is the same as this number.

I wait 44875 did you leave out the number 6?

In accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 10 and 11 of General Assembly resolution 47 202 A of 22 December 1992, the Chairman of the Committee on Conferences held consultations with the chairmen of organs concerned, where the utilization factor was lower than the established benchmark figure for the last three years.

Not that you know how long number 11 actually is, but you would be able to compare number 11 against the Pantheon with number 11 against the Baths of Caracalla, and so on and so forth.

If you calculate with the right number of ads 4 instead of 64

And we can We'll figure that out later with a calculator.

Especially because there's nothing left to compare the 3 to, there's nothing lower there's no elements before the 0th element, so let's just stick the 3 right over there.

But the scary number is the third number.

yottajoules

Extraction

Number

Number

Number