And it works out the dimensional analysis and hopefully it also makes sense to you intuitively

Now, another way, a completely legitimate way we could have done this, is we could have just subtracted the exponents.

Once again we got the same way, completely legitimate way to solve it.

And reasonable, too.

So I will first do the memorizing way that you might be exposed to and they'll use something called FOlL.

A resource kit has been developed as a logical and consistent way in which to organize information on the Convention.

And that is a completely legitimate way to figure out a determinant. And that was our definition for how to find a determinant.

Now there's one alternate way that you could factor this and it'd be completely legitimate.

We are not reinventing the wheel all of this flows from a logical and political way of looking at things.

They learn to overlook short sighted reactions and impulsive thinking, to think in a long term, more consequential way.

Make it infinitely expandable and affordable to the poor.

Boolean values

Boolean value

(logical or) .EXOR.

(logical and) .THEN.

It wouldn't make sense.

least reasonably logical.

Now it makes sense.

It just makes complete common sense.

Well, if they're soft, I'm soft.

This idea is not rational.

Such arguments have the ring of common sense.

(unary logical not) .OR.

How Iogical is that?

And that makes sense, right?

We're very logical creatures.

Therefore, pi is not rational.

It defies common sense.

Do they make sense?

It is simply not possible.

We need to look carefully at our zero tolerance policies.

It's the logical end to what was always a ridiculous scheme.

Any differentiation between Christians and other groups is based on objective and reasonable criteria.

So hopefully I'm making some sense to you, as I try to make some sense of this problem.

It all comes together sensibly.

Corresponding a angles make the most sense to me.

Well this one actually is maybe the most intuitive.

And this is actually a rather good comparison, it seems to me.

So therefore, pi cannot be rational.

And hopefully, it will make a little bit more sense.

Only in yours have I found a sane point of view.

Most free societies accept such limits as reasonable.

The world apos s cities must become sustainable, safe, healthy, humane and affordable.

In the State party's view, this difference of treatment is based on objective and reasonable criteria.

At first glance, this was a rational and predictable outcome.