Nevertheless, the Supreme Court dismissed the authors' appeal.

Thirdly, he could have brought a case to court.

(c) by a declaration before the court or by a written communication in a specific proceeding.

It is true it takes an average of two years for the Court to settle a case.

The State party points out that the author should have lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.

On 12 September 2002, the Supreme Court declared the appeal inadmissible.

In civil matters an aggrieved party is at liberty to institute proceedings before a court of competent jurisdiction.

Finally, the author instituted amparo proceedings in the Constitutional Court for the protection of her constitutional rights on the grounds of judicial error. This application was also denied.

It treated the claim by Colombia as a claim about customary law and dismissed it on account that Colombia had failed to produce evidence of its existence.

On 25 September 1989, the company filed a suit in the Court for Administrative Affaires of First Instance.

(c) Directly filed a complaint with the competent tribunal against those held to be responsible for the acts

Three of the other parents in the national court suit, and the NHA, decided to bring their complaint to the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter denominated ECHR)).

On 21 April 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's appeal.

Individuals who feel they have been subjected to labour discrimination may file the appropriate claim with the courts.

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has also been filed against the government s civil nuclear programme at the Supreme Court.

She said that an appeal had been made to the Constitutional Court regarding the unconstitutionality of certain provisions contained in the Civil Code.

When Nelson sued, the court issued a heinous ruling upheld by the Iowa Supreme Court affirming his right to dismiss her for this reason.

According to the author, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on formal and procedural grounds, without having re examined the weighing of the evidence by the lower court.

quot 2. An organization over which the Tribunal has jurisdiction may intervene in a complaint on the grounds that the ruling which the Tribunal is to make may affect it.

When his complaint was rejected at the lower court and appeal levels, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court.

2.2 The author filed an appeal in the Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo) alleging violations of procedural guarantees and substantive rights.

In January 2005, Nada Management brought suit in the federal criminal court, seeking an end to the investigation.

The author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 25 October 1999 on the grounds that the court of first instance had already resolved the matter.

A court which is to hear a case should not be involved nor seem to be involved in the preparation of the prosecution apos s case.

In May 1993, the company sued the State of Argentina and the Province of Neuquén in the Superior Court of the Province of Neuquén.

(d) The Court shall allow written and oral pleadings in every proceeding pursuant to articles 5 to 7 of the present annex.

(d) The Court shall allow written and oral pleadings in every proceeding pursuant to Articles 5 7 of this Annex.

File suit?

Subsequently, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court, alleging, among other arguments, the failure of the Provincial High Court to state the grounds for its decision.

Violation can be judged in courts, but there is no Law that defines domestic violence as a crime.

2.3 The author lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 29 January 1997.

Any woman or man can sue or be sued.

The author then appealed (amparo) to the Constitutional Court (Tribunal Constitucional), which dismissed his appeal on 20 October 2004.

The decisions of the High Court of Australia in Mabo v. Queensland constitute a very significant development.

On 25 July 2000, the District Court dismissed the author's request for interim measures on the use and possession of the common flat on grounds that the other set of proceedings concerning that issue (the trespass proceedings) were pending and that it was not competent to decide the question in the proceedings concerning the division of the property.

2.4 On 1 July 1998, the author applied to the Regional Court to establish a new time limit for lodging her appeal.

2.3 The complainant filed suit with the Vizcaya Provincial Court alleging that he had been tortured, and on 7 November 1997 the Court found three Civil Guards guilty of torture.

quot 1. Anyone to whom the Tribunal is open under article II of the Statute may intervene in a complaint on the grounds that the ruling which the Tribunal is to make may affect him.

Procedural issues Action popularis

It's a suit for civil disobedience.

Let's go protest this right now.

Everything's proceeding well.

I'll sue you for slander

Sue them for damages!

In his submission on 23 April 2001, the author cited the Constitutional Court ruling of 28 June 1999 to allege that it was not necessary to lodge an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.