From the very first day on, the defendants behavior...

Thereafter, the first and second plaintiffs commenced proceedings against the defendant.

The defendant had added the first plaintiff in the action under the guarantee.

The defendant commenced proceedings against the parent company of the first plaintiff under the guarantee.

The first defendant raised various procedural submissions as to why the leave granted should be set aside.

The correspondence from the defendant requested that the first plaintiff chose between litigation and arbitration.

Just as the other fellow... The... The defendant, what was his name?

The defendant was not called.

The first plaintiff argued that the defendant had rescinded the arbitration clause by agreement in correspondence between the solicitors of the parties.

The court granted the application of the defendant to stay the proceedings of the first and second plaintiffs in favour of arbitration until the completion of the arbitration.

The defendant supplied three medical reports.

...Eva Hermann, Defendant, Emil Hermann.

The defendant stands accused of one murder and one act of mayhem.

Donald Inc. (the respondent) in order to obtain reimbursement of part of the ticket price.

The stay was granted, but the claimant appealed against it.

Spare me the lecture. I know it by heart now.

The marshal will produce before the tribunal the defendant Hahn.

The marshal will produce the defendant Hoffstetter before the tribunal.

The marshal will produce the defendant Lammpe before the tribunal.

The marshal will produce the defendant Ernst Janning before the tribunal.

The Court rejected the application and concluded that the respondent was still bound by the arbitration agreement.

The defendant applied to stay the action commenced by the first plaintiff, based on article 8(1) of the Model Law, and to stay the action of the second plaintiff pending resolution of the arbitration between the first plaintiff and the defendant.

Therefore, as the claimant did not raise any objections, the Court appointed the respondent's nominee as arbitrator.

In turn, the plaintiff brought an incidental warranty action in appeal against the respondent.

A representative of the defendant disputed both quantum and liability.

Defendant Park Il soon will eventually vanish into a dot.

And they're going to try to convince you either to find the defendant guilty or to find the defendant not guilty.

If Your Honor please, it is my belief that the defendant is innocent... and I intend to enter a plea accordingly.

The defendant is not...

The prosecution is denouncing the defendant before the trial has even begun.

The prosecutor called to the bar the first witness of the Romano case.

Do you have any personal opinions with regard to the defendant that might prejudice you on his behalf?

It was in fact for the arbitrators to decide what effect, if any, the respondent's failure to settle demurrage should have on the respondent's liability.

Moreover, whereas the defendant was not able to cross question her ophthalmologist, the author had the opportunity to cross question the expert proposed by the defendant.

On many occasions, developed country Governments were the defendants.

The court refused the applications of the defendant to set aside the judgment enforcing the award.

But either way, you don't want your decision to be like flipping a coin.

The defendant was put in probation for 12 months.

In the Court's view, the respondent's right to be heard was not infringed through the allegedly incomplete discussion of the respondent's essential arguments in the reasoning of the award.

The defendant argued that, for procedural reasons, the award should not be enforced.

The first letter from those representing the defendant offered a choice between arbitration and litigation.

(b) Junior counsel was also representing the fourth co defendant in the same trial

The request for divorce, because of unmendable differences caused by the defendant, is based on the following reasons, hyphen...

To preserve legal formalities, I must ask you, as jurors, ...is the defendant guilty or not guilty?

Herr Rolfe... further asserts that the defendant Janning... was an extraordinary jurist... and acted in what he thought was the best interest of his country.