2. A State is no longer entitled to exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a corporation that acquires the nationality of the State against which the claim is brought after the presentation of the claim.

As a result, there was no violation of the respondent's right to equality.

The facts as established by the Latvian court during adjudication of the applicant's criminal case are as follows

In the present case it is not disputed that the act about which the applicant complained, the detention of the aircraft leased by it for a period of time, was implemented by the authorities of the respondent State on its territory following a decision to impound of the Irish Minister for Transport.

The Commission recommended a fine of up to 10 per cent of the turnover of each of the respondents.

Subsequently, the respondent States in those cases all submitted preliminary objections relating to the Court's jurisdiction to entertain the case and to the admissibility of the Application.

For the view that the Bosphorus case mainly involves the way in which the defendant State implemented a Community measure, see G. Cohen Jonathan, Cour européenne des droits de l'homme et droit international général (2000), Annuaire français de droit international, vol. 46 (2000), p. 614 at pp. 619 620.

The new documentation was transmitted to the State party for comments, to ensure equality of arms, and the State party has commented on it.

Alleged victim(s) The complainant

Alleged victims The complainant

On behalf of The complainant

Alleged victims The complainants

Alleged victim The authors

The defendant supplied three medical reports.

Alleged victim The authors

In the State party's view, the author, as a member of the Cortes, occupied a different position from that of the majority of defendants, and was therefore to be treated differently.

The respondents applied to have the Commission's directives set aside.

Alleged victim The complainant

The rendering and administration of justice within its territory is a basic function of a State and an obligation from which it cannot be excused.

Having accepted the jurisdiction of a court in this manner, that State would no doubt want to be certain of access to that court for trial of persons alleged to have committed offences of that kind.

Donald Inc. (the respondent) in order to obtain reimbursement of part of the ticket price.

The stay was granted, but the claimant appealed against it.

An analysis of the issues (such as those involving consent and how cases and defendants are brought before the court) may not be the same for the narrow class of State sponsored war crimes as it would for narco trafficking.

It was in fact for the arbitrators to decide what effect, if any, the respondent's failure to settle demurrage should have on the respondent's liability.

The dispute arose out of a reorganization of the German Hockey League by the respondent, the German Hockey Association ( the Association'), as a result of which the claimant, a hockey club, was downgraded to the second league.

Female defendants who are pregnant or raising children under 36 months of age and have clear residence address are subject other preventive measures instead of temporary detention, except for special cases.

With regard to paragraph 2, the Commission was commended for revising the exhaustion requirement, which it had previously limited to remedies available as of right in the municipal law of the respondent State.

State controlled banks allocate capital.

In turn, the plaintiff brought an incidental warranty action in appeal against the respondent.

Moreover, whereas the defendant was not able to cross question her ophthalmologist, the author had the opportunity to cross question the expert proposed by the defendant.

(c) It is not submitted in writing by the alleged victim or by close relatives of the alleged victim on his her behalf or by a representative with appropriate written authorization.

The State party's submission on admissibility and the author's comments thereon

Children alleged to have infringed or recognized as having infringed penal law

On many occasions, developed country Governments were the defendants.

In the Court's view, the respondent's right to be heard was not infringed through the allegedly incomplete discussion of the respondent's essential arguments in the reasoning of the award.

The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that a State party's obligations under the Covenant apply as of the date of its entry into force for that State party.

'Ministers will be delivering messages from ISIS territory'

This precisely what the State party did is now faulted by the Committee.

The State party's submission on the merits of the communication and author's comments

State party's observations on admissibility and merits and author's comments

Children alleged to have infringed or recognized as having infringed penal law

No overlap due to the nature of the loss asserted

Children alleged to have or recognized as having infringed penal law

Alleged victim Mr. Validzhon Alievich Khalilov (author's son)

Alleged victim The author's son, Angelos Celal (deceased)