The total world demand, the supply of oil is probably a nice pattern.

As global oil demand increases, there is not enough capacity to meet it a cycle that will continue until demand collapses.

It simply reflects the recessionary (or deflationary) force of weak global demand hanging over the world economy.

And emerging economies could unleash their consumers, boosting global demand.

The ever increasing global demand for energy and industrial goods and services represents a daunting challenge.

1 billion barrels of oil will satisfy global demand for only 12 days.

To make up the difference, Americans need to compete effectively for a portion of global demand.

In response to that request, the Secretary General has established the Trust Fund for the World Summit for Social Development.

Upon request substantive support will be provided to national action to further implementation of the World Programme of Action.

In the context of a recovering world economy, and given a sustained surge in demand from developing countries, particularly from China, India and countries of Latin America, world demand for oil grew steadily in 2004.

That will allow them to contribute in a sustainable way to increasing global demand.

Right now, the global economy is suffering a grand mal seizure of slack demand and high unemployment.

This is no surprise for an export led economy dependent on faltering global demand.

But now demand for cocaine in most of the world is stable or dropping.

On the one hand, they can compensate for the global weakness by turbo charging their own internal demand through aggressive fiscal stimulus.

Keep in mind that global energy demand will double by 2050.

Global demand for energy, raw materials, and food is increasingly influenced by rising demand in China and India, whose combined population is 2.5 billion.

Thus, the recovery of global aggregate demand will be weak, pushing global growth much lower.

Ukraine suffers from the sharp drop in global demand and trade, severely undermining its steel industry.

Small wonder, then, that Germany s economy rockets when the world s demand for capital goods soars.

And, given rising global demand for oil, particularly in developing countries, energy import prices will remain high.

A return to high growth rates globally will require a broader revival of demand.

We eventually got, I think, 60 percent of global production at the table and 25 percent of demand at the table.

As the current boom in the world economy is largely fueled by investment demand rather consumption demand, only Germany profits from it to full measure.

There is no doubt that China currently is suffering from the global collapse in demand for a wide range of manufactured products.

The world economy today, desperate for demand, can t count on either mechanism.

Long term global demand for Africa s commodities, land, and manpower is unlikely to diminish.

Huge investments worth trillions of euros will be needed to meet global energy requirements.

Oil exporters and China have been accounting for two thirds of global oil demand growth in recent years.

The GM has supported its demand side focus in part through the provision of catalytic resources from its own budget.

World oil demand is not expected to increase significantly in 1993, owing mainly to the continued economic slow down in overall world economic activity.

As the Financial Times Martin Wolf, among others, has pointed out, the German economy has been free riding on global demand.

This is not to say that rebalancing global demand is unimportant. Quite the contrary.

Accordingly the global demand for nuclear knowledge and materials, including the programs for development of fuel cycle facilities are growing rapidly.

(ii) Reports to the Preparatory Committee for the World Summit for Social Development and the Summit itself (as required)

For example, UNDCP stands to benefit in its demand reduction efforts from the World Conference on the Role of Non Governmental Organizations in Demand Reduction, scheduled to take place in 1994.

All of this should be complemented by a rebalancing of global demand toward dynamic markets, including emerging economies.

But perhaps the world should be thankful, because without American profligacy, there would have been insufficient global aggregate demand.

The independent evaluation recommended that the GM rethink its choice to focus on the demand side of financial resource mobilization.

The Global Mechanism has supported its demand side focus in part through the provision of catalytic resources from its own budget.

Rather than intervening to obtain a short term increase in their share of slow growing global demand, it makes sense for countries to make their economies more balanced and efficient over the medium term. That will allow them to contribute in a sustainable way to increasing global demand.

The build up of reserves contributes to global imbalances and insufficient global aggregate demand, as countries put aside hundreds of billions of dollars as a precaution against global volatility.

Meanwhile, global demand for energy will soar as the economies of China, India, Brazil, and other countries grow.

Ongoing private and public debt deleveraging has kept global demand growth below that of supply.

In that connection, there is a worldwide effort under way to ensure that there are sufficient amounts of the raw material available to meet growing demand.