Trial Chamber I

trial commenced on 19 September 2005 before a different Trial Chamber Section in Trial Chamber III and the Prosecution is presenting its case.

(b) Pre Trial Chamber II Uganda

On 19 September 2005, Trial Chamber I commenced the Mpambara trial.

8 The membership of the three Pre Trial Chambers is Pre Trial Chamber I Judges C. Jorda (presiding), A. Kuenyehia and S. Steiner Pre Trial Chamber II Judges T.

(c) Pre Trial Chamber III Central African Republic.

Through pre trial and pre defence status conferences, a Trial Chamber has the authority to streamline trial proceedings.

Following the Appeals Chamber's decision of 28 September 2004 and its reasons of 22 October 2004, the trial will start de novo before a different Trial Chamber Section in Trial Chamber III.

On 15 July 2004, the Appeals Chamber rendered a decision on Mugiraneza's appeal against the decision of the Trial Chamber on exclusion of evidence by directing the Trial Chamber to reconsider Mugiraneza's request.3 The Appeals Chamber also dismissed the Prosecutor's counter appeal.

Some Trial Chamber Sections sit in morning and afternoon shifts.

The Trial Chamber denied this motion on 10 November 2005.

Some Trial Chamber Sections sit in morning and afternoon shifts.

The Chamber attended to pre trial matters in four cases.

The Chamber attended to pre trial matters in five cases.

Trial Chamber III heard three trials contemporaneously during the second mandate.

Their cases will start as soon as trial chamber capacity allows.

Trial Chamber III heard three trials contemporaneously during the second mandate.

However, owing to the delay in establishing the second trial chamber, the third trial only commenced in March 2005.

New trials will start as soon as Trial Chamber capacity is available.

In January 2004, the Trial Chamber issued decisions ordering three joint trials.

On 2 April 2002, the Chamber also started the Military I trial and heard evidence over thirty two trial days.

Furthermore, it would enable all pre trial and Appeals Chamber proceedings to continue without interrupting the conduct of any trial.

On 2 April 2002, the Chamber also started the Military I trial and heard evidence over thirty two trial days.

However, experience shows the usefulness of twin tracking one joint trial with a single accused trial, as well as the Trial Chamber Sections sitting in shifts.

However, experience shows the usefulness of twin tracking one joint trial with a single accused trial, as well as the Trial Chamber Sections sitting in shifts.

Trial Chamber II was engaged in three trials concurrently during the second mandate.

(a) Pre Trial Chamber I Democratic Republic of the Congo Darfur, the Sudan

Trial Chamber II was engaged in three trials concurrently during the second mandate.

In previous Completion Strategy submissions, projections were premised on an average of 150 trial days per year, per Trial Chamber Section.

On 20 September 2004, a different Trial Chamber Section commenced the Military II trial, in which the Prosecution is presenting its case.

This makes it difficult to maintain six Trial Chamber Sections on a permanent basis.

This makes it difficult to maintain six Trial Chamber Sections on a permanent basis.

In February 2004, the President of the Special Court requested a second Trial Chamber.

Following an appeal filed by the defence, the Appeals Chamber, in its decision of 28 September 2004 and reasons on 22 October 2004, disqualified the judges engaged in the trial and ordered that the trial start de novo before a newly constituted Trial Chamber (see para.

Following the commencement of the third mandate in 2003, Trial Chamber I was reconstituted and has been hearing the continuation of the Military I case (Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze and Nsengiyumva), transferred from the previous Trial Chamber III.

The Appeals Chamber noted that the reasons for which the Trial Chamber had certified the appeal were unclear, as the matters contained therein appeared to relate to the admissibility of the diary as evidence, which should be dealt with by the Trial Chamber in accordance with rule 89 (C).

On 3 December 2003, Trial Chamber I delivered judgement in the so called Media case .

That provision grants a Trial Chamber broad discretion in assessing the admissibility of evidence.8

With nine ad litem judges, the Tribunal is able to set up six Trial Chamber Sections.

On Wednesday 7 December, he appeared before the Trial Chamber, which accepted the guilty plea agreement.

Slade (presiding), M. Politi and F. Diarra Pre Trial Chamber III Judges S. Steiner (presiding), T.

With nine ad litem judges, the Tribunal is able to set up six Trial Chamber Sections.

A third trial, in the case of three members of AFRC, was delayed owing to the unavailability of a complement of second Trial Chamber judges.

The report mentions that, as the workload of the Trial Chamber decreases, the focus will shift to the Appeals Chamber, where an increase in work is anticipated.

On 5 November 2003, the Trial Chamber commenced trial in the Government case, involving four government ministers (Casimir Bizimungu, Justin Mugenzi, Jerome Bicamumpaka and Prosper Mugiraneza).