Sorry, there is no profile data

There is scientific data on this.

There is no data in the clipboard.

There is no usable data in the clipboard.

And there's only data where there is light.

There is currently insufficient data to predict either outcome confidently.

There is no instruction info in the profile data file.

The data is what sits there and then program will start up, it will operate on the data, the program will stop and the data will still be there.

(e) Overall, there is a lack of standardized treatment data data based on harmonized methods and concepts.

When reading or writing data there is no need to stop the flow of data to switch tracks.

There is limited data to suggest the benefit of granulocyte infusion.

There is still a huge frustration that people have because we haven't got data on the web as data.

We learned a moment ago that there is tons and tons, tons more data out there.

We also learned how to use and understand data. Remember there are tons of data out there.

There is little data to support the effectiveness of most of these therapies.

There was no new data, but there was less fear.

There is a need to understand the data that are available but this need is hindered.

There are no data disaggregated by sex.

There was an error loading data providers.

We've manually entered all the data there.

There is also, in any sector, the issue of what the data really mean.

A data logger is a data acquisition system, but a data acquisition system is not necessarily a data logger.

However there are less data about this dimension.

There are no exact data in this field.

There's just so much data out there, right?

Checking out the high speed data there Gigi?

If there is enough time and money, most data will be able to be recovered.

There is less equality of opportunity in the United States today than there is in Europe or, indeed, in any advanced industrial country for which there are data.

Without statistically relevant data for backing and implicit generalization, there is no guarantee that the generalization is correct.

Interestingly, there are data on these two groups of people, data on how happy they are.

There are many areas of Antarctica with no data, or no current data, on penguin populations.

Interestingly, there are data on these two groups of people, data on how happy they are.

This is the data that is compared to last year's data?

Once the data are collected, there is no need to stay connected to the flow cytometer.

There is a unified data system in place at all entry and exit points in Mauritius.

There is limited gender disaggregated data and access, and therefore gender analysis cannot be effectively done.

Of course, there remain gaping holes in the data.

There are other problems with poor countries GDP data.

I was working there collecting data for my thesis.

There are many usages of this data, but the bottom line is that the historical record is being digitized.

There was data online from a 2006 environmental risk conference, other geospatial data, none of it integrated.

Data is relationships.

Where this data is going to be that data.

This is from real data in California, looking at wind data and solar data.

On the other hand, a data dictionary is a data structure that stores metadata, i.e., (structured) data about data.