(b) Mr. Zuhir Ibn Mohamed Said Saddik

Mr. Kälin said that Mr. Amor's paper, while reflecting the Committee's position, did so too harshly.

Mr. Sandoval (Chile) said that his delegation supported Canada's position.

Mr. Velázquez (Paraguay) said that his delegation supported Germany's position.

Mr. Monningstad (Norway) said that Norway was strongly committed to peacekeeping.

Mr. BOBOHONOV (Tajikistan) said that forced marriage was punishable by law.

Mr. D'Allaire (Canada) said that the text as drafted was satisfactory.

Mr. CHIKANDA (Zimbabwe) said that his delegation preferred the original wording.

Mr. Taal (Gambia) said he would look into the issues raised.

Mr. Madrid Parra (Spain), supported by Mr. Bellenger (France), Mr. Houmann (Observer for Denmark), Mr. Sandoval (Chile), Mr. Velázquez (Paraguay) and Mr. Yang Lixin (China), said that the proposed amendment dealt satisfactorily with a situation that was not otherwise covered by the draft convention.

Mr. Mitrović (Serbia and Montenegro) said that the German proposal was valid.

Mr. CHIKANDA (Zimbabwe) said that the words Noting the importance were crucial.

Mr. BEST (Switzerland) said that in that light, he withdrew his objection.

Mr. Requeijo Gual (Cuba) said that the report seemed to contradict itself.

The white mayor visited Mr. Teszler and said, Mr. Teszler, I trust you re going to be hiring a lot of white workers.

Mr. Xie Bohua (China) said that his delegation supported the no action motion.

Mr. Boulet (Belgium) said that the issue was not merely terminological but substantive.

Mr. Bellenger (France) said that his delegation favoured retaining draft paragraph 3 (b).

Mr. CHIKANDA (Zimbabwe) said that the paragraphs addressed two distinct and important issues.

Mr. BEST (Switzerland) said that he had absolutely no objection to that solution.

Ms. Moroianu Zlatescu and Mr. Jabbour also commended the importance of said visit.

Mr. KASEMSUVAN (Thailand) said that rumours about televising of executions were completely unfounded.

Mr. Frydenlund (Norway) said that Norway also wished to sponsor the draft resolution.

Mr. Nordlander (Sweden), Ms. Lahelma (Observer for Finland) and Mr. Madrid Parra (Spain) said that the draft article was acceptable as it stood.

They said this country was too divided, too disillusioned to ever come together around a common purpose, Mr. Obama said.

Ibrahim b. Abd El Mohsen Al Rayyes, Dr. Said b. Mubarek b. Zair, Mr. Jaber Ahmed Abdellah al Jalahma and Mr. Abderrahman Al Lahem.

Mr. Boulet (Belgium) said that his delegation supported the thrust of the draft article.

Mr. Mazzoni (Italy) said that he supported the position of the delegation of Belgium.

Mr. SHIGEEDA (Japan) said that his delegation endorsed the draft resolution as a whole.

Mr. Taal (Gambia) said that affirmative action policies did not exist in the Gambia.

Mr. Fahey (Ireland) said that his delegation welcomed the Committee's excellent and detailed questions.

Mr. D'Allaire (Canada) said that party autonomy was a key principle in contractual dealings.

Mr. RIVAS POSADA said that he regretted the late submission of the written replies.

Mr. Sandoval (Chile) said that draft article 16 bis was acceptable to his delegation.

Mr. Murillo Carrasco (Bolivia) said that Bolivia also wished to sponsor the draft resolution.

Mr. Meena (India) said that he was not in favour of introducing a time limit.

Mr. Mazzoni (Italy) said that he could accept the wording proposed by the United States.

Mr. CHANDRANSU (Thailand) said that his Government did not intend to suspend habeas corpus procedures.

Mr. SUJATMIKO (Indonesia) said that his delegation supported the text of paragraph (b) as revised.

Mr. Velázquez (Paraguay) said that he opposed the introduction of a mandatory rule of disclosure.

Mr. Bellenger (France) said that his delegation's proposal had not been rejected out of hand.

Mr. Sunaga (Japan) said that Japan would abstain from voting on the revised draft resolution.

Mr. Farooq (Pakistan) said that no organization could deliver results without adequate and predictable resources.

Mr. Adensamer (Austria) said that the issue was not as complex as it might appear.

Mr. Bellenger (France) said that his delegation supported the deletion of draft paragraph 1 (b).