They cite the need to deliver high returns for shareholders, implying that tighter regulations undermine shareholders interests.

Corporate Political Speech is Bad for Shareholders

In many but by no means all countries, the primary corporate objective is to maximize the long term return to shareholders (shareholder value).

The police, for example, claimed that the company declared that their major shareholders accounted only for 64 percent of the company's shareholders, but that, in reality, the major shareholders at Seibu actually owned 88 percent of the company's shares.

Protection of shareholders

No Shareholders Spring

The alternative may be too expensive for shareholders and citizens alike.

In a financial restructuring, shareholders typically get wiped out, and bondholders become the new shareholders.

Direct injury to shareholders

Should Shareholders Be Kings?

Don t confuse saving bankers and shareholders with saving banks. America could have saved its banks, but let the shareholders go, for far less than it has spent.

The fundamental purpose of drug companies is to produce profits for shareholders.

Growth is demanded by shareholders.

In the past, bank executives bonuses were often based on accounting measures that are of interest primarily to common shareholders, such as return on equity or earnings per common share.

Major shareholders such as institutional investors should not have privileged access to information that is unavailable to minority shareholders.

Such managers can be expected to use their influence to obtain and maintain rules that weaken the rights of dispersed shareholders and make it difficult for shareholders to replace them.

Draft article 11 Protection of shareholders

Diamond apparently forgot that the continued existence of any bank with a balance sheet that is large relative to its home economy and its ability to earn a return for shareholders depends entirely on maintaining a good relationship with regulators.

Draft article 12 Direct injury to shareholders

In this situation, without safeguards for minority shareholders, the latter group may be adversely affected.

In such countries, rules are supposed to limit the controlling shareholders power to advance their interests at the expense of minority shareholders.

At the same time, there is a double agency problem, as the ultimate shareholders individual shareholders don t directly control boards and CEOs.

In the interest of protecting minority shareholders, the principle of equality of disclosure should be practiced, such that all shareholders receive information equally.

For banks and their shareholders, it looks a case of heads they win, tails we lose.

This makes it more worthwhile for businesses to invest in expanding their capacity, thus trading away cash they could distribute to their shareholders today for a better market position that will allow them to reward their shareholders in the future.

The common shareholders in financial firms do not have an incentive to induce executives to take into account the losses that risks can impose on preferred shareholders, bondholders, depositors, and taxpayers. Consequently, governance improvements that make directors more focused on shareholder interests cannot be relied on to tie executive payoffs to the interests of shareholders and non shareholders alike.

Our age is defined by this complementarity. Unless the public sector invests, and invests wisely, the private sector will continue to hoard its funds or return them to shareholders in the forms of dividends or buybacks.

Shareholders seem to take little interests in pay policy.

Don t confuse saving bankers and shareholders with saving banks.

Their speculative frenzies ruined shareholders, customers, and the economy.

But the shareholders of Arcelor have made their choice.

This information is of particular interest to minority shareholders.

America could have saved its banks, but let the shareholders go, for far less than it has spent.

Lowering entrenchment levels, rather than trading on them, continues to offer opportunities for substantial returns to firms shareholders.

Indeed, the average holding period for America s core shareholders, like Fidelity and Vanguard, has increased in recent decades.

Thirty years on, shareholders have broken definitively with this system.

Debt equity swaps rescue the banks without rescuing their shareholders.

One set of concerns arises from the perspective of shareholders.

They find that holding durations for two of America s primary shareholders, Fidelity and Vanguard, have not budged since 1985.

For example, after receiving only 43 of shareholders support, Bruce Gans, an independent director of Hospitality Properties Trust, resigned.

Even basic elements of business organization like limiting public shareholders obligation for corporate debts are said by Brazilian legal experts, such as Bruno Salama, to remain an open question, with all shareholders potentially exposed, especially in labor and tax lawsuits.

By removing that possibility, we would substantially enhance the benefits of equity based compensation for the performance of firms and for their shareholders.

The Fund s shareholders would have to agree to incur those costs.

Shareholders organized themselves into pension funds, investment funds, and hedge funds.

a return for the insolent ,