The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

Iraq also provided comments on this claim.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

On 20 August 2001, the secretariat severed the parts of claim No. 5000194 relating to these studies and assigned them to claim No. 5000453.

Accordingly, the claim for loss of profits on contracts is time barred and the Panel has considered the original claim for the loss of receivables.

On 14 April 2004, Iran submitted a proposal to amend Claim No. 5000287 by, inter alia, introducing three new claim units.

This is the basis of the French claim on this Antarctic land.

The Committee considers that this claim should be examined on the merits.

In support of this claim, Turkey relies on the same facts and evidence which it submitted in support of its fourth F4 instalment claim.

Secessionists should have a reasonable claim to being a national group that, preferably, enjoyed stable self government in the past on the territory they claim.

On 13 August 2003, the secretariat transferred a part of claim No. 5000456 in the fourth F4 instalment and assigned it to claim No. 5000288.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

Iraq asserts that this claim is based on theoretical models.

Iraq further asserts that Jordan's claim of a reduction in rangeland productivity is based on just two values for productivity in 1983 and in 1993, and that the claim is inappropriately extrapolated from the rangeland productivity claim.

The claim about bad living conditions has been falsely blamed on Qatar.

The Committee decides that this claim should be examined on its merits.

Iran relies on evidence from the published literature to support its claim.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Claim

The claim

Another piece of good news is that the Europeans have now given up their claim on naming the IMF s managing director (as have the Americans their corresponding claim on the World Bank presidency).

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

Making good on its claim to the South China Sea could be next.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

It treated the claim by Colombia as a claim about customary law and dismissed it on account that Colombia had failed to produce evidence of its existence.

The claim rested on the assumption of a large reduction in global energy use.

On 21 September 2000, the secretariat transferred this claim to the F4 claims category.

(c) If upon payment of the amounts referred to in sub paragraphs (a) and (b) above on any claim, that claim will have a remaining balance of 100,000 or less, the Executive Secretary may pay the full remaining balance of the claim

Whether, and if so to what extent, any such claim by a government will succeed depends on the nature of the claim and the evidence produced to support it.

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The Governing Council determined in decision 123 that a claim can only be found to be a stand alone claim if the claimant first demonstrates that he or she had the authority to act on behalf of the Kuwaiti company in filing a claim.

The African Union's claim of two permanent seats on the Council must therefore be supported.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

The claim was dismissed.

Overlapping claim

The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

Mr. and Mrs. Karawa cannot rely on illegal actions as the basis of their claim.

No one was expelled until a final decision had been made on the asylum claim.