Physical protection of nuclear material and nuclear facilities and assessment of vulnerability of nuclear facilities

Iran s nuclear facilities are dispersed some are underground.

Provide for the physical protection of nuclear facilities.

Currently there are no active nuclear facilities in Latvia.

Since 2001 it has also emphasized protection against nuclear terrorism and attacks on nuclear facilities.

Presently a voluntary check is done by the nuclear facilities.

These activities aimed to further enhance the capacity of Member States to protect nuclear facilities and nuclear material against nuclear terrorism.

Austria attaches great importance to a high level of physical protection of nuclear material and nuclear facilities.

These locations are generally not as well protected as nuclear facilities.

Technical assistance in destruction of nuclear weapons, delivery systems and facilities

Israel, the only State in the region which possesses nuclear facilities and a nuclear stockpile, must accede to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. All of its nuclear facilities must also be placed under the IAEA safeguards regime and its nuclear stockpile must be eliminated.

New Zealand also accepts the reference to the inviolability of nuclear facilities.

France henceforth has no more facilities for the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other explosive nuclear devices.

The National licensing agencies are the National Inspectorate of Strategic Products and Nuclear Power Inspectorate (for nuclear materials, facilities and equipment).

A military attack on Iran s nuclear facilities is too dangerous, and its results uncertain.

LOS ANGELES Nuclear facilities as military targets? The drumbeat appears to be growing louder.

Facilities at the Atomic Weapons Establishment for handling nuclear materials are covered by the Nuclear Installations Act of 1966, and enforced by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII).

This covers nuclear power plants as well as all other nuclear facilities, the transportation of nuclear materials, and the use and storage of nuclear materials for medical, power, industry, and military uses.

Once fully operational, these facilities will give Iran mastery of the entire nuclear fuel cycle.

We should do everything in our power to make all nuclear facilities safe and secure.

The Conference calls upon these States to place their nuclear facilities under comprehensive IAEA safeguards.

Welcoming the significant unilateral reduction measures taken by other nuclear weapon States, including the closing down and dismantling of nuclear weapon related facilities,

It would also require countries to protect nuclear facilities against acts of sabotage, which could have consequences similar to those of nuclear accidents.

The EU also welcomes the fact that many facilities for the production of nuclear materials for nuclear weapons have been shut down or dismantled.

There have been embarrassing security lapses at nuclear facilities, and sensitive material is often inadequately secured.

Now if you consider the fact that nuclear weapons proliferation is associated with nuclear energy proliferation, because we know for example, India and Pakistan developed nuclear weapons secretly by enriching uranium in nuclear energy facilities.

There has been widespread fear that Iran would abrogate the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and use its enrichment facilities to develop a nuclear weapon.

The closer Iran gets to developing a nuclear weapon, the greater the likelihood that Israel, with or without US help, might attack Iran s nuclear facilities.

An armed attack by the United States, Israel, or both on Iran s nuclear facilities is another possibility.

The Bill also creates an offence of threatening to use any such material, devices or nuclear facilities.

Exporters should ensure that recipients have in place effective physical protection of relevant nuclear material and facilities.

Work on revising its guidelines on nuclear power plants, research and fuel cycle facilities is nearing completion.

It strongly condemned Israel for developing nuclear weapons and persistently refusing to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency access to its nuclear facilities in contravention of all international agreements on nuclear proliferation.

By aiming to ensure that nuclear materials and facilities do not contribute to nuclear proliferation, the Treaty creates the necessary environment for technological transfer and cooperation.

The States parties express their serious concern at the continuing development whereby Israeli scientists are provided access to the nuclear facilities of one nuclear weapon State.

Of course, every country with nuclear power facilities should revise its safety measures in light of the Japanese disaster, which raised obvious questions about the sites chosen for such facilities.

Emphasizing the need for appropriate measures on the question of the prohibition of military attacks on nuclear facilities,

Emphasizing the need for appropriate measures on the question of the prohibition of military attacks on nuclear facilities,

Emphasizing the need for appropriate measures on the question of the prohibition of military attacks on nuclear facilities,

As a society, we are gambling with our big banks, with our nuclear power facilities, with our planet.

Emphasizing the need for appropriate measures on the question of the prohibition of military attacks on nuclear facilities,

The States parties call on the nuclear weapon States and all States not party to the Treaty to place their nuclear facilities under IAEA full scope safeguards.

Nevertheless, it called on both States to accede to the NPT and submit their nuclear facilities to IAEA surveillance.

They also strengthened the capability of Member States to assess the vulnerability of nuclear facilities to possible malicious acts.

But, despite these potential drawbacks, an armed attack on Iran s nuclear facilities will and should remain a distinct possibility given the enormous strategic costs of a nuclear armed Iran.