I think what we have before us is a United States proposal, not a proposal by the Chairman you hinted, Sir, at dropping non proliferation at the end of your proposal.

Not as an alternative to any existing proposal, but to make you and your capitals think.

In that case, the original proposal shall be considered as withdrawn and the revised proposal shall be treated as a new proposal.

In response to your previous question as to whether your proposal as a whole would serve as a basis, we just heard a delegation state that it had difficulty with the proposal, especially agenda item 2, that it was proposing a completely new item and that it insisted on the addition of a third item.

So we would like to express our doubt as to whether it is useful to discuss your proposal any further.

That proposal fell in two parts.

We understand, Mr. Chairman, that your revised proposal sort of draws on the 2004 Chair's proposal I think it does a very able job of condensing and drawing on the work of last year's Georgian Chair.

Proposal

Proposal

Nothing in our proposal is cast in stone.

(EU proposal)

EU PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL PRODUCERS

A proposal is considered an amendment to another proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

This was exactly my proposal in the consultations.

Concerning the substance of the proposal, several delegations confirmed that there was great merit in considering the proposal by Costa Rica.

Mr. Mekel (Israel) requested clarification of the proposal by the representative of Lebanon and, in particular, the reasons for the proposal.

Concerning the substance of the proposal, several delegations confirmed that there was great merit in considering the proposal by Costa Rica.

Here's my proposal.

Proposal by Cuba

DRAFT Internal Proposal

The proposal reads

We are dealing with the Chair's proposal and not with a United States proposal or any proposal from any delegation or group of delegations.

I have a more fitting proposal for clerics in favor of this bogus call gouge your eyes out with a tack hammer if you wish to refrain from being seduced.

It also means that if you cannot accept a certain proposal, you explain your reasoning behind it, and subsequently you put forward a credible counterproposal.

We heard today a response from the United States delegation to the NAM proposal, and now we are hearing a proposal from the United States that seems to me to be a new proposal, not the Chair's proposal.

He declined my proposal.

She rejected my proposal.

I accept his proposal.

Their proposal went unheeded.

Background to the proposal

Guatemala appreciates their proposal.

Proposal by the secretariat.

Proposal by Costa Rica

The Secretary General's proposal

Reasons for the proposal

Proposal by the President

The long term implications of the agreement stand in sharp contrast both to Obama s February 2010 budget proposal and to the Republicans counter proposal.

We welcome the G 8 proposal for irrevocable debt cancellation for the HIPC countries, a proposal that has generated high expectations in eligible countries.

There are three powerful arguments in favor of this proposal.

That proposal has no chance of success in Ukraine s parliament.

The compromise proposal in A CN.9 WG.III WP.54

The project's overall objective, as stated in the proposal, is

At some point down the road, I will take the floor again, and we can begin to do line ins and line outs on your proposal.

We can also say that there was an emerging consensus on my proposal at least on my proposal on the item on nuclear weapons before the NAM proposal arose.