Other claims with this loss type relate to loss of cash.

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

Contract None of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for a loss of contracts.

Loss of profits Fourteen of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for loss of profits for a total asserted value of KWD 1,278,108 (approximately USD 4,422,519).

Stock The claims for loss of stock in this instalment mainly concern the loss of inventory as a result of theft or destruction of stock.

The claimants in that report did not submit any claims for medical treatment costs. They submitted claims for mental pain and anguish and loss of future earnings only.

With respect to business loss claims, the analysis is more complex.

Real property None of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for a loss of real property.

Iraq, therefore, argues that all claims for compensation for interim loss of non commercial environmental resources should be rejected.

Three of the 605 detainee claims include D8 D9 (individual business) loss claims for losses sustained by Kuwaiti companies, of which the deceased detainees were shareholders.

The average number of loss types per claim is higher in this instalment than for claims in the regular category D claims programme as a whole.

Income producing property None of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for a loss of income producing property.

It asserts that claims for interim loss of natural resources without commercial value have no precedent in general international law.

Cash The claims for loss of cash in this instalment did not raise any new legal or verification and valuation issues.

In connection with the claims by governments for loss of life and reduced quality of life of their nationals, Iraq asserts that the claims are inadmissible because the Claimants concerned lack legal standing to bring such claims before the Commission.

These claims were typically for the loss of funds in bank accounts in Kuwait or Iraq or for uncashed cheques or payable promissory notes.

As stated above, the eligible category D Palestinian late claims have a higher number of loss types per claim and substantially higher amounts claimed than claims in the regular category D claims programme.

He also claims adequate compensation for the loss suffered in terms of career opportunities, salary and pension befits, as well as for his legal expenses.

THE STAND ALONE CLAIMS Applying the procedures described above, the Panel has reviewed the stand alone claims according to the nature and type of loss identified.

As stated above, the eligible category D Palestinian late claims have a higher incidence of loss types and higher amounts claimed than claims in the regular category D claims programme, giving rise to a potential risk of overstatement of the claims.

Tangible property general The claims for loss of tangible property in this instalment did not raise any new legal or verification and valuation issues.

With regard to the admissibility of claims for loss of life and reduced quality of life, the Claimants maintain that loss of life and reduced quality of life are clearly and properly compensable by the Commission.

For the claims in the fifth F4 instalment, the Panel equally finds that Security Council resolution 687 (1991) and the relevant decisions of the Governing Council provide sufficient guidance for the review of the claims for compensation for loss of or damage to natural resources.

They argue that, under the settled principles of international law, loss of life and reduced quality of life of nationals of a State represent injuries to the State, and claims for such injuries can be asserted as State claims rather than as the claims of individual nationals.

According to Iraq, claims for interim loss of non commercial resources have no basis in Security Council resolution 687 (1991) or Governing Council decision 7.

With respect to the claims for loss of tangible business property and loss of business income, the Panel finds that the evidence supports recommended awards of compensation in the respective amounts of USD 7,005 and USD 17,500.

In 75 per cent of the D1 (departure) claims and 35 per cent of the D1 (MPA) claims, claimants failed to prove the essential legal requirements of ownership, loss or causation.

The Panel finds that both claims fail because the claimants failed to prove the essential legal requirements of ownership, loss or causation.

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

Iraq states that Kuwait's claim for loss of individual well being is inadmissible because it relates to losses suffered directly by individuals who could have submitted such claims to the Commission.

Claimants in this instalment submitted the same type of evidence encountered by the Panel when reviewing loss of tangible property claims in the previous E4 instalments, particularly instalment twenty three (A), which relates to stand alone claims.

The Panel finds that each of these claims fails because the claimants failed to prove the essential legal requirements of ownership, loss or causation.

Kuwait claims that each individual with PTSD suffered a decrease in well being equivalent to the loss of one fourth of a life year.

The damage or losses for which compensation is claimed include expenses of medical treatment for specific diseases and mental conditions as well as general claims for loss of life or reduced quality of life of the population.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

In their view, the methodologies utilized by them in the fifth F4 instalment claims are internationally accepted methods for measuring the extent of loss of natural resources so that proper compensation can be made for such losses.

As was the case in prior E4 instalments, the claims for loss of goods in transit mainly concern goods that were in Kuwait on the day of Iraq's invasion and that were subsequently lost.

Whilst LOAC IHL makes provision for inter State claims for compensation, there is no express provision for individual claims.

Another loss for our nation.

A terrible loss for literature.

The E4 Panels have previously considered this type of loss in the context of stand alone claims in paragraph 80 of the Instalment Twenty Three (A) Report, and in the context of overlapping claims in paragraph 40 of the Special Overlap Report.

In such an instance, the Panel has valued the company losses as a whole and, in this respect, confirms the application to the stand alone claims of paragraphs 39, 41 and 42 of the Special Overlap Report relating to the consolidation of losses from several claims for the loss of one company.

Iran also claims that the invasion and occupation caused a delay in the implementation of a fisheries project and that the delay caused financial loss to the IFC.

Now this is what many introverts do, and it's our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues' loss and our communities' loss.

I'm at a loss for words.