Some now argue that large scale engagement in Afghanistan was a mistake.

Others argue that China s government is simply losing its grip over local authorities.

Some argue that with this decision private companies will be less anxious when doing business with Iranian customers.

Interestingly, some are arguing that despite the Supreme Court's ruling, people still aren't legally bound to stand up when the national anthem is played at a cinema hall.

And basically, we lived for all those years, and some might argue that we still do, in a situation of being on the brink, literally, of an apocalyptic, planetary calamity.

We've based the design of our settlements, our business models, our transport plans, even the idea of economic growth, some would argue, on the assumption that we will have this in perpetuity.

And Ali009 reasons

Some now argue that large scale engagement in Afghanistan was a mistake. But, in the mirror of history, we can see that the greater mistake has been to abandon the country altogether.

Some could argue that Ethiopian maids who export themselves to Arab countries face even the worst type of abuse there, so better that they be anyway here.

The conflict theorist argues that this relationship is unequal and favors the owners.

Nobody could argue with any of these goals. But their formulation is inconsistent.

No one could dispute the frustrations and despair engendered by foreign occupation and domination, by dictatorship and racist regimes, but neither could anyone deny the anguish and guilt felt at the summary executions of innocents.

After all, it is much more difficult to make an argument for market economies when they are under siege.

Some have even lost their jobs.

Some recognize the risks.

Tweet, link, and love?

John Searle argues vehemently (and in my opinion cogently) against universal constructionism.

We didn't all know each other, but we all kind of trusted each other, and that basic feeling of trust permeated the whole network, and there was a real sense that we could depend on each other to do things.

Some argue that Japan is an example of a nation state.

Some reject the need to set priorities.

Some have even declared that the India story is over.

While some welcomed him with open arms, others wondered why should someone who has worked so closely with the regime be accepted as an alternative to Mubarak. Following are some of the reactions from Twitter

Here is a quote from blog The Constitution Some wonder about the reasons behind not wanting Nasser Al Mohammed to be reappointed as the Prime Minister.

We like to celebrate each other's successes in life.

Others, however, remain uncooperative.

We know that our borders are very close to each other.

The paper Development and Security by Frances Stewart argues that security and development are deeply interconnected.

In Proposition 18 he argues that there are no further convex regular polyhedra.

Some nationalists argue that the nation was always there, indeed it is part of the natural order, even when it was submerged in the hearts of its members.

However, proponents of the capabilities approach argue that income is easier to misrepresent, and moreover, fails to target the root causal factors of poverty.

Now I really think as the world is getting smaller, it becomes more and more important that we learn each other's dance moves, that we meet each other, we get to know each other, we are able to figure out a way to cross borders, to understand each other, to understand people's hopes and dreams, what makes them laugh and cry.

For some, an international community simply does not exist.

The difference, it was argued, was monetary union.

Not a huge problem, one might have thought.

Some have concluded that the rebalance is directed at China.

Some of us honestly thought that history was over.

Some have accused Japan of fueling a global currency war.

Some thought this system would last forever.

The scale of that achievement seems to have been missed by some.

Some may cooperate others do not.

Some proponents of meat eating argue that the current mass demand for meat has to be satisfied with a mass production system, regardless of the welfare of animals.

There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other to learn from each other to respect one another and to seek common ground.

Iraq also argues that Saudi Arabia has overestimated the costs of the proposed preserves.

Some people like baseball, others like soccer.

Some others confirm that news channels are off the air in the country.