Against Simplification

Simplification and harmonization

D. Simplification and harmonization

11. Simplification and harmonization

B. Simplification and harmonization

K. Simplification and harmonization

So we can simplify a little bit.

So this we can simplify

And now we just get into simplification mode.

OK, now we can simplify.

And I'm making gross oversimplifications here.

B. Simplification and harmonization . 52 55 16

K. Simplification and harmonization . 63 64 17

The ones lowering their gaze to the luscious face of simpleness.

let's just call that a 9.0 for simplicity.

So it's up to debate what simplified really means.

But this view is simplistic.

But for simplicity we often just leave it that way.

We'll assume that here, but that's a gross oversimplification.

And now we get the answer 0 by simplifying.

And now let's see if we can simplify.

This is far too simplistic.

And lo and behold, we've done some serious simplification.

So you can't make it too simple.

Simplification is not limited to administrative work.

Now this looks like we can do a little bit of simplifying

And let's see if we can do any kind of simplification here.

This shows that it would be too simplistic an approach to draw a mere analogy between a State and an international organization, in particular between the status of the internal law of a State and the rules of an organization.

One covered a pilot approach for short term contracts to provide a more streamlined and flexible approach for the hiring of individuals who perform functions limited in duration and therefore non permanent in nature.

Eric Berlow How complexity leads to simplicity

A successful narrative can be neither too complicated nor simplistic.

A simplistic and one sided approach is out of place.

His simplification is true as long as x does not equal 4.

And what mattered more, it was a simplification that worked.

But I was in Milan and saw this street sign, and was very happy to see that apparently this idea of minimalism has even been translated by the graffiti artist.

Nowadays, many scoff at that notion as too simplistic.

NEW YORK It is said that Americans have a genius for simplification.

So I can rearrange this, and I will rearrange it so that it's in a way that's easy to simplify.

And now what does this simplify into? We have something plus 1 2 times something else, minus 1 2 times that original something

And just as a simplification, mu could be a function of x and y.

Of course, that is a somewhat simplistic dichotomy.

We're assuming the t is in radiance, just for simplicity.

If this is the case, and this is a As I've said repeatedly, this is a gross oversimplification.

But when r1 and r2 involved complex numbers, we got to this simplification.

The lump sum approach is more costly in practice