The General Assembly considered this question at its forty ninth session, in 1994 (resolution 49 21 I).

6.2 The Committee notes that this matter was already considered by the European Court of Human Rights on 29 May 2002.

6.2 The Committee notes that this matter was already considered by the European Court of Human Rights on 14 November 2000.

The General Assembly considered this question at its fifty sixth to fifty eighth sessions (resolutions 56 155, 57 226 and 58 186).

The bill establishing the weapons and ammunition regime which was under study by the National Legislation Commission in September 2004 governs the issue.

At its forty fourth session, the Committee considered the item and decided to remain seized of the matter.

Thereafter, the Assembly has considered the question annually (resolutions 55 219, 56 125, 57 175, 57 311 and 58 244).

The General Assembly considered this question at its fifty second, fifty third and fifty fifth sessions (resolutions 52 169 M, 53 1 H and 55 44).

The General Assembly considered this question at its forty fifth session and biennially as of the forty sixth session (resolutions 45 191, 46 143, 48 205, 50 105, 52 196, 54 211 and 56 189).

Like the treaty bodies, these special procedures have considered issues related to the protection of human rights while countering terrorism (see A 59 404, paragraph 16) and in the last three years have issued important joint declarations on this question.

During the eighteenth session of the Tribunal, the Committee on Budget and Finance gave consideration to the matter on the basis of proposals presented by the Registry.

The question is this.

In the cab, I stared out the window at this beautiful land.

Consequently, the State party's reservation applies also to situations where the same matter has previously been examined by the European Court.

If you take a look just at water, what we see is that, with four very common products, you look at how much a farmer produced to make those products, and then you look at how much water input was put into them, and then you look at what the farmer was paid.

That question should perhaps be made clear in the commentary.

The United Nations is not alone on this issue.

UNAMA is facilitating discussions in this matter.

Subsequently, the General Assembly considered the issue at its thirty ninth to forty second sessions and then biennially thereafter (resolutions 39 210, 40 185, 41 165, 42 173, 44 215, 46 210, 48 168, 50 96, 52 181, 54 200 and 56 178).

Thereafter, the Assembly considered the question biennially (resolutions 50 58 B, 52 169 G, 54 96 E and 56 105).

Tell me how to solve the problem.

Having considered the reports of the Secretary General on the financing of the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus and the related reports of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions,

The problem is actually an extrapolation from the game show.

Debate on the issue therefore resumed in plenary.

This matter, however, is not for the Committee to determine.

It was to be hoped that the draft articles would not go into that matter.

The issue was raised in the informal questionnaire.

This was a very important issue for his Group, and it would be important for the Board to return to the matter at its thirty seventh executive session.

Technical work on the issue has continued in the Bretton Woods institutions and further consideration of this issue is envisaged.

Scope of the note The secretariat has prepared this note to assist Parties in their consideration of this matter.

Indeed, while it is a much disputed question, de Gaulle was probably right about America s lack of commitment to the nuclear defense of Europe. Both Henry Kissinger and Robert McNamara left office admitting that de Gaulle had been correct.

Please tell us your personal and close experience on this.

Nicaragua has raised that issue in a number of forums.

In the absence of speakers, the Committee thus concluded its consideration of this question.

Its very existence depends on the successful resolution of this issue.

This is a major handicap in addressing the issue.

The General Assembly considered this item at its fifty first to fifty eighth sessions (resolutions 51 103, 52 120, 53 141, 54 172, 55 110, 56 148, 57 222 and 58 171).

So far as this matter is concerned, I am completely satisfied.

Therein lies a profound contradiction.

Why did you start blogging about this?

Any student can solve this problem.

We will report further on this issue.

14. Decides to continue its consideration of the question at its sixtieth session.

14. Decides to continue its consideration of this question at its sixtieth session.

Decides to consider this question at its sixty second session