I have given consideration to this issue.

The Fifth Committee had considered the question, and the item continued to be considered annually.

The General Assembly first considered this question at its forty seventh session (resolution 47 96).

Inspection Unit The Committee considered this question at its 58th meeting, on 25 March 1993.

25. The Committee considered this question at its 43rd meeting, on 18 December.

27. The Committee considered this question at its 44th meeting, on 19 December.

29. The Committee considered this question at its 44th meeting, on 19 December.

35. The Committee considered this question at its 45th meeting, on 21 December.

37. The Committee considered this question at its 45th meeting, on 21 December.

33. The Committee considered this question at its 44th meeting, on 19 December.

Accordingly, the Advisory Committee reports annually to the General Assembly on the administrative budgets of the organizations in the United Nations system and on aspects of inter agency administrative coordination.

The General Assembly considered this question at its forty ninth session, in 1994 (resolution 49 21 I).

The SBSTA considered the matter at its fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth sessions and completed its consideration of the methodological aspects. The SBSTA referred the consideration of the request of the Government of Croatia back to the SBI, which again

The SBSTA considered this matter at its 1st and 4th meetings, on 19 and 27 May, respectively.

The Committee considered this question at its 63rd and 66th meetings, on 5 and 21 April 1993.

This matter was considered by ICSC at its June July 1994 session.

At its 350th meeting, on 19 May 1993, the Committee considered a note by its secretariat on the question.

At that session, the Assembly considered the question further (resolution 47 118).

6.2 The Committee notes that this matter was already considered by the European Court of Human Rights on 14 November 2000.

The General Assembly considered this question at its fifty sixth to fifty eighth sessions (resolutions 56 155, 57 226 and 58 186).

6.2 The Committee notes that this matter was already considered by the European Court of Human Rights on 29 May 2002.

The bill establishing the weapons and ammunition regime which was under study by the National Legislation Commission in September 2004 governs the issue.

The General Assembly considered this question at its forty fifth to forty seventh sessions (resolutions 45 213, 46 141 and 47 197).

36. At its 366th meeting, on 22 August 1994, the Committee considered the report of the Secretary General on the matter (A 49 212).

It did, however, consider the issue under item 111 (Advancement of women), in the context of the work of the Third Committee (see also item 101 above).

At its forty fourth session, the Committee considered the item and decided to remain seized of the matter.

Since 1961, the Special Committee has considered the matter and made recommendations to the General Assembly.

The General Assembly considered the question at its forty first, forty fifth and forty seventh sessions (resolutions 41 197, 45 227 and 47 42).

The General Assembly considered this question at its forty fourth, forty fifth and forty seventh sessions (resolutions 44 118 B, 45 61 and 47 44).

Thereafter, the Assembly has considered the question annually (resolutions 55 219, 56 125, 57 175, 57 311 and 58 244).

But in this circumstance, if I just look at my situation,

So hopefully you see that this problem is the exact same thing as this problem.

On the issue of this question depended whether I should continue my work at Briony

And it was represented by this problem.

The amount and the base in this problem.

Isn't this close enough?

Something the matter, miss?

So that's our problem.

31. The Committee considered this question at its 44th meeting, on 19 December. It had before it the report of the Secretary General (A C.5 48 41).

The General Assembly considered this question at its fifty second, fifty third and fifty fifth sessions (resolutions 52 169 M, 53 1 H and 55 44).

3. At its 350th meeting, on 19 May 1993, the Committee considered a note by the Secretariat on the question (A AC.172 1993 CRP.10).

But in this case, it worked out doing it this way.

There are 6 rays in this problem

And there are there is an exponent in this problem, right over here.

The question is this.