In 1939 the Soviet Union signed the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact a non aggression pact with Nazi Germany dividing Eastern Europe into two separate spheres of influence.

Background The Soviet Union had signed international and mutual nonaggression treaties with Finland the Treaty of Tartu of 1920, the Non aggression Pact between Finland and the Soviet Union signed in 1932 and again in 1934, and further the Charter of the League of Nations.

Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Sustaining the NPT

We continue to regard the NPT as a deeply flawed and discriminatory treaty.

The Non Proliferation Treaty, with 188 States parties, is truly a global treaty.

Withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

We are also a party to the NPT.

The Non Aligned States Parties to the NPT welcome the adoption of the agenda of the 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the NPT.

Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) (in March 1985) Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) (in January 1991) and Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction (CWC) (in July 1997).

the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of 12 February 1970

Preferring not to push onward, Ashraf opened negotiations which led to the signature of a peace treaty in October, 1727 (Treaty of Hamedan).

Negative security assurances are vital to the strengthening of the NPT.

2000 Review Conference of the Parties to the NPT

Preservation of the integrity of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons regime

Strengthening the implementation of article X of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Strengthening implementation of article III of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

An equitable and verifiable FMT could in part bring non NPT nuclear weapon States into the non proliferation regime.

Working paper presented by the members of the Group of Non Aligned States Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

The NPT rests on three pillars non proliferation, disarmament and peaceful nuclear cooperation.

However, it neglects the fact that any greater reward for non membership in the NPT or further disruption of the balance between rights and obligations of NPT members under the non proliferation regime will lead to its disintegration rather than the intended strengthening.

The Group of Non Aligned States parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons recalls that the Preparatory Committee for the 2005 Review Conference was mandated and tasked to undertake the following

The nuclear non proliferation regime is equipped with a number of acts of international law, like the Non Proliferation Treaty and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

Working paper presented by the members of the Group of Non Aligned Movement States parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Yemen has acceded to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

We are party to the NPT and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.

The CD and the NPT regime are separate entities, with respective roles to play.

Those provisions of the Convention were fully consistent with the NPT.

We will continue to take an active and constructive part in the NPT review process.

NPT a dynamic instrument and core pillar of international security

Statement by the Collective Security Treaty Organization at the 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

The integrity and viability of the NPT also depend on States parties fulfilling their non proliferation commitments.

Most likely, they meant that there was a period of time when they did not think about their abuse. But not thinking about something is not the same thing as being unable to remember it.

2000 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

For many, the Treaty is an end in itself.

Latvia attaches great importance to achieving universality and compliance with the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

Latvia also feels the need to address the issue of withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

The effectiveness and credibility of the NPT depended on its universality.

Implementation of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the 1995 resolution on the Middle East

We emphasize the urgency of full compliance with the provisions of article VI of the NPT.

We would like to reiterate our support for the decisions and the resolution adopted at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference and for the Final Document of the 2000 NPT Review Conference.

Statement by the delegation of Malaysia, on behalf of the Group of Non Aligned States Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, at the plenary of the 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, concerning the adoption of the agenda, New York, 11 May 2005

Cuba's accession to the NPT and to the Tlatelolco Treaty completed the establishment of the nuclear weapon free zone in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) is an important issue, because the attitude of the nuclear weapon States affects the reliability of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

Recent developments in the field of nuclear non proliferation emphasize the need to strengthen the NPT regime in order to maintain the authority and integrity of the Treaty.