keywords arbitration clause arbitrator court interim measures

Ecuador

The enforcement court found that the lack of competence of the arbitral tribunal could not be invoked at the time of the recognition of the arbitral award.

The Court of Appeal directed that all issues between the claimant and the respondent be referred to arbitration.

So now that we have this PCA ruling, we re so happy, because this judgement is recognized by the international community.

North Atlantic Coast Fisheries, decision of the arbitral tribunal, RIAA, XI, 167, 181 (7 September 1910) (cited in McNair, supra note 36, at 702 n.

The respondent also argued before the enforcement court that the arbitral tribunal lacked jurisdiction for the reason that the arbitral award dealt with damages in tort as well as in contract.

Finds that the arbitration proceedings instituted by the Claimant come within the competence of the Arbitration Court of the International Chamber of Commerce and that the Arbitrator has jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute in conformity with Article 13(3) of the Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration of the ICC.

These include the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), and the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).

(iii) the interim measure has been terminated or suspended by the arbitral tribunal or, where so empowered, by the court of the State in which the arbitration takes place or under the law of which that interim measure was granted or

If, within six months of the date of the request for arbitration, the parties are unable to agree on the organization of the arbitration, any one of those parties may refer the dispute to the International Court of Justice, by application, in conformity with the Statute of the Court.

Algeria considered that no dispute of such nature must be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice without the consent of all the parties to the dispute.

Algeria considered that no dispute of such nature might be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice without the consent of all the parties to the dispute.

On July 12, the United Nation s Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled that Beijing s claims to the South China Sea have no grounds.

Algeria believed that any dispute of this kind could only be submitted to arbitration or referred to the International Court of Justice with the consent of all parties to the dispute.

Algeria believed that any dispute of this kind could only be submitted to arbitration or referred to the International Court of Justice with the consent of all parties to the dispute.

keywords award arbitration agreement arbitrator court

It declared that to refer a dispute relating to interpretation and application of the Migrants Protocol to arbitration or the International Court of Justice, the agreement of all parties concerned in the dispute was necessary.

A British court held in 1977 that the Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1927 was a multipartite law making treaty and thus not terminated by the Second World War

keywords arbitration agreement arbitration clause arbitrators competence judgement

The claimant (main contractor) appealed against the decision of a lower court, which had referred various disputes between the claimant and the respondent (sub contractor) to arbitration.

3 of the New York Convention.

It declared that to refer a dispute relating to interpretation and application of the Protocol to arbitration or the International Court of Justice, the agreement of all parties concerned in the dispute was necessary.

The Jury

arbitrability

Arbitration

It declared that to refer a dispute relating to interpretation and application of the Convention to arbitration or the International Court of Justice, the agreement of all parties concerned in the dispute was necessary.

The distinction between arbitration clause and arbitration agreement is no longer relevant.

award recognition of

Arbitration Chapter 16

Arbitration Chapter 17

It declared that to refer a dispute relating to interpretation and application of the Firearms Protocol to arbitration or the International Court of Justice, the agreement of all parties concerned in the dispute was necessary.

In such a case, the writing containing the arbitration clause constitutes the arbitration agreement for the purposes of article 35.

(ii) a court that would give effect under article 76 to an exclusive choice of court agreement specifying the place named in the arbitration agreement that is exclusive with respect to the action against the carrier.

(iii) To comply with the essential requirement that the arbitration agreement be supplied when application is made to a court or competent authority for recognition and enforcement of an award (New York Convention, article IV(1)).

Accordingly, the Court agreed with the tribunal that the arbitration was commenced under the Arbitration clause with the 3 add on' proposals agreed by the parties (i.e. an arbitration to be held in Singapore, with SIAC Rules and in English).

(b) the arbitration procedure or

Members of the jury are

Article 83. Arbitration agreements

Similarly, an Italian court did not rule on the effect of the Second World War on extradition treaties until 1970, and a British court did not assess the effect of the Second World War on the Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1927 until it became an issue in a 1977 case.

(i) commencing arbitral proceedings pursuant to the terms of the arbitration agreement in a place specified therein, or

The appellant argued that its statements had not been not adequately taken into account by the arbitrators in the settlement of the dispute, which was referred to them. The Court of Appeal confirmed that that argument did not constitute a ground for refusing recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award.

The claimant then applied to the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg seeking to set aside the award according to  1059 ZPO, based on article 34 MAL.

On the basis of article 8 (1) MAL, the claimant sought a stay in favour of arbitration with regard to the action brought by the respondent before the Queen's Bench of Alberta.

Human Rights, Arbitral Tribunals established pursuant to multilateral agreements, the Appellate Body within the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, as well as the International Court of Justice.