4.1 In its observations of 19 January 2005, the State party maintains that the communication should be considered inadmissible.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005, S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005, S 2005 15 Add.27 of 19 July 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.29 of 3 August 2005.

5.1 By submission of 28 July 2000, the State party argues that the communication is inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005, S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005, S 2005 15 Add.27 of 19 July 2005, S 2005 15 Add.29 of 3 August 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.36 of 20 September 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005, S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005, S 2005 15 Add.27 of 19 July 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.29 of 3 August 2005.

1.1 The author of the communication dated 10 October 2003, with supplementary information dated 2 January 2004, is Ms.

Annex to the letter dated 26 September 2005 from the Permanent Representative of the Lao People's Democratic Republic and Chairman of the Group of Landlocked Developing Countries addressed to the Secretary General

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

During the informal sessions, the Working Group took up the following six cluster II issues, as proposed by the President of the General Assembly in his letter of 10 February

This assertion, too, is supported by inadequately substantiated, not to say contradictory, arguments from the complainant in his comments of 4 August 2002.

Sensitive Fuses and Sensors for Mines Other Than Anti Personnel Mine, Proposal for Best Practice (document CCW GGE VIII WG.2 WP.3, dated 5 July 2004) by Germany Sensitive Fuses in Mines Other than Anti Personnel Mines (document CCW GGE IX WG.2 WP.1, dated 11 November 2004) by the United Kingdom Mines other than Anti Personnel Mines laid outside perimeter marked areas (document CCW GGE VIII WG.2 WP.2, dated 30 June 2004) by Ireland.

Upon instructions from our Governments, we are answering your letter of 27 July 2001 and conveying to you our joint position concerning the outstanding assessed contributions of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

However, on the occasion of the Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996, the nuclear weapon States emphasized that, in their opinion, there are circumstances in which resort to nuclear weapons would be lawful .

Note dated 22 November 1952 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Colombia

A 55 127 of 10 July 2000, paragraph 26.

4.16 In its observations of 29 December 2004 on the authors' comments of 6 December 2004, the State party again argues that the communication is inadmissible.

See, in particular, A 52 534 of 27 October 1997, paragraphs 11 to 15, and A 57 187 of 2 July 2002, paragraphs 2 to 8.

Proposals and ideas on MOTAPM in the Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) with the purpose to provide a basis for further work (document CCW GGE VIII WG.2 1, dated 11 June 2004) by the Coordinator on MOTAPM.

Proposals and ideas on MOTAPM in the Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) with the purpose to provide a basis for further work (document CCW GGE IX WG.2 1, dated 15 October 2004) by the Coordinator on MOTAPM.

k CERD C 304 Add.110 of 1 May 2001.

In this regard, he refers to the medical certificate of 13 March 2003.

I write with reference to my predecessor's letter of 27 February 2004 (S 2004 153).

The Equal Remuneration Convention (Convention No. 100) of 9 August 1966

I refer to my predecessor's letter of 11 June 2003 (S 2003 649).

The mandate of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People for the year 2005 is contained in General Assembly resolutions 59 28, 59 29 and 59 30 of 1 December 2004.

Recalling also its resolution 56 211 of 21 December 2001, as well as Economic and Social Council resolution 2001 21 of 26 July 2001 and its agreed conclusions 1995 1 of 28 July 1995, 2000 2 of 27 July 2000 and 2002 1 of 26 July 2002,

I write with reference to my letter of 19 October 2004 (S 2004 834).

I write with reference to my letter of 25 July 2005 (S 2005 482).

I write with reference to my predecessor's letter of 23 February 2005 (S 2005 114).

I write with reference to the Chairman's letter of 23 February 2005 (S 2005 119).

German Constitutional Court, judgement of 24 March 2002, 2 BvR 2175 01.

I write with reference to my letter of 25 August 2004 (S 2004 686).

I write with reference to my letter of 25 July 2005 (S 2005 483).

I write with reference to my letter of 16 December 2004 (S 2004 1004).

Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention (Convention No. 156) of 5 June 1985

As I have indicated in the interim report, the National Coordinating Committee is in the process of preparing Nauru's substantive response to the questions raised by the Committee in its letter of 6 June 2003.

I have the honour to transmit a letter dated 22 December 2005 from the Chairman of the Security Council Informal Working Group on General Issues of Sanctions addressed to the President of the Security Council, transmitting the report of the Security Council Informal Working Group on General Issues of Sanctions on its activities in 2005 (see annex).

I write with reference to my predecessor's letter of 12 September 2002 (S 2002 1016).

I write with reference to my letter of 19 October 2004 (S 2004 843).

I write with reference to my predecessor's letter of 23 February 2005 (S 2005 116).

I write with reference to my letter of 19 October 2004 (S 2004 853).

I write with reference to my letter of 16 December 2004 (S 2004 1005).