The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005, S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005, S 2005 15 Add.27 of 19 July 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.29 of 3 August 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005, S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005, S 2005 15 Add.27 of 19 July 2005, S 2005 15 Add.29 of 3 August 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.36 of 20 September 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005, S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005, S 2005 15 Add.27 of 19 July 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.29 of 3 August 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005, S 2005 15 Add.20 of 31 May 2005 and S 2005 15 Add.21 of 7 June 2005.

1.1 The author of the communication dated 10 October 2003, with supplementary information dated 2 January 2004, is Ms.

The Equal Remuneration Convention (Convention No. 100) of 9 August 1966

4.16 In its observations of 29 December 2004 on the authors' comments of 6 December 2004, the State party again argues that the communication is inadmissible.

4.1 In its observations dated 18 June 2001, the State party challenges the admissibility of the communication.

That had been clearly stated by the International Court of Justice in its Advisory Opinion of October 1975.

He did the same in his letter dated 22 August 2005 addressed to the President of the Security Council.

4.1 By submission of 23 July 2002, the State party challenges the admissibility of the communication.

Note dated 22 November 1952 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Colombia

A 55 127 of 10 July 2000, paragraph 26.

5.1 In a letter dated August 2002, the complainant stands by the points made in his initial complaint.

See, in particular, A 52 534 of 27 October 1997, paragraphs 11 to 15, and A 57 187 of 2 July 2002, paragraphs 2 to 8.

Norway has signed the International Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missiles Proliferation and urges all United Nations Members to join this important instrument.

k CERD C 304 Add.110 of 1 May 2001.

In this regard, he refers to the medical certificate of 13 March 2003.

I write with reference to my predecessor's letter of 27 February 2004 (S 2004 153).

I refer to my predecessor's letter of 11 June 2003 (S 2003 649).

In response to the queries raised in its letter of 29 June 2005, we are pleased to inform the Committee that

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in document S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005.

The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in document S 2005 15 of 25 February 2005.

4.1 By submissions of 10 September 2003, the State party disputed both the admissibility and the merits of the communication.

Convention Supplementary to the Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy of 29 July 1960 (Paris Convention)

Recalling also its resolution 56 211 of 21 December 2001, as well as Economic and Social Council resolution 2001 21 of 26 July 2001 and its agreed conclusions 1995 1 of 28 July 1995, 2000 2 of 27 July 2000 and 2002 1 of 26 July 2002,

I write with reference to my letter of 19 October 2004 (S 2004 834).

I write with reference to my letter of 25 July 2005 (S 2005 482).

I write with reference to my predecessor's letter of 23 February 2005 (S 2005 114).

I write with reference to the Chairman's letter of 23 February 2005 (S 2005 119).

German Constitutional Court, judgement of 24 March 2002, 2 BvR 2175 01.

I write with reference to my letter of 25 August 2004 (S 2004 686).

I write with reference to my letter of 25 July 2005 (S 2005 483).

I write with reference to my letter of 16 December 2004 (S 2004 1004).

Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention (Convention No. 156) of 5 June 1985

As I have indicated in the interim report, the National Coordinating Committee is in the process of preparing Nauru's substantive response to the questions raised by the Committee in its letter of 6 June 2003.

4.1 By submission of 17 November 2002, the State party contests the admissibility and merits of the complaint.

5.1 In their comments of 4 August 2003, the authors contest the State party's observations on admissibility.

The note supplements the budgetary information contained in my note of 6 June 2005 (A C.5 59 33).

Recalling the initiative of the Secretary General of 13 September 2000 to improve food security in the Horn of Africa over the long term,

In his letter of 19 August 2005, the Chairman informed the State party that it had reviewed the implementation of the Convention in Seychelles in the absence of a report.

I write with reference to my predecessor's letter of 12 September 2002 (S 2002 1016).