(a) Estimates of gross national income

Its turnover in 2013 reached 1499 million euros in net revenues and 176 million euros in net income.

In 2013, turnover reached 1499 million euros in net revenues and 176 million euros in net income.

This would mean a direct negative shock to household spending in the US of around 5 of national income, and of around 3.5 in Europe and Asia.

This was the result of the steady decline in national income.

Net monthly income in September 2011 averaged 5,397 kuna ( 729 euro).

Current earmarkings are based on gross national income (GNI) per capita for 2001.

a Low income GNI per capita of 735 and less.

We repeat the goal is only 0.7 per cent of gross national income.

If China runs an investment income deficit with net assets of almost 2 trillion, how will it make the transition to an investment income surplus?

First, the scale for 2007 2009 should be based on the most current available GNI data.

It is easy to imagine each social group demanding a larger share of national income, which by definition is inflationary.

Lower middle income GNI per capita between 736 and 2,935.

c 2003 per capita GNI estimate based on United Nations Statistics Division data.

However, although GNI was the best approximation of capacity to pay, it was not the only one.

The usual assumption is that household consumption falls by around 0.05 for each 1 decline in household wealth. This would mean a direct negative shock to household spending in the US of around 5 of national income, and of around 3.5 in Europe and Asia.

National saving in the Nordic countries averages more than 20 of national income, compared to around 10 in the US.

The European Union has now set a clear timetable to achieve the 0.7 per cent target for aid.

The average net monthly income grew compared to 5,311 kuna ( 717 euro) in 2009 or 3,326 kuna ( 449 euro) in 2000.

On the contrary, it included the former Yugoslavia in the scales of assessments that it adopted for the periods 1995 1997 and 1998 2000, based on national income gross national product data for Serbia and Montenegro.

And this zero hunger program costs .5 percent of GDP and has lifted many millions of people out of hunger and poverty.

The greater the number of girls who go to secondary school, the Bank adds, the higher the country s per capita income growth.

His delegation welcomed the commitment by a number of development partners to achieving the 0.7 per cent target of gross national income (GNI) as official development assistance (ODA) to developing countries, and urged all partners to try to reach the target of 0.15 to 0.20 per cent of GNI as assistance to the least developed countries by 2010.

The promise of 0.7 means that the rich world would give developing countries a mere 70 cents out of each 100 of national income.

From the outset, we have led the efforts to increase this assistance to 0.7 per cent of gross national income by 2015.

Indeed, from 2000 to 2004, the increase in net government expenditures accounted for 150 of income growth, as other sources of income shriveled up.

Economic indicators Personal income, jobs and unemployment Net monthly income in September 2011 averaged 5,397 kuna ( 729 euro), dropping 2.1 relative to the previous month.

As stated in paragraph 1, the recalculation uses 2003 per capita GNI and population data.

It had no objection to the use of GNI data covering periods up to 2004 in preparing the scale of assessments for 2007 2009.

As such, we welcome the recommitment to the Monterrey and Johannesburg outcomes and the renewed emphasis upon the achievement of the target of 0.7 per cent of gross national income for official development assistance.

However, the principal element of the methodology should continue to be capacity to pay, the most accurate reflection of which was gross national income (GNI).

The rate of contributions for health insurance is calculated on net incomes (the employed, 15 per cent, pensions 3.75 per cent and cadastral income of farmers at 15 per cent).

I don t see any other, more pressing, reforms such as raising income taxes to pay for national security gaining any traction in the Bush regime.

The early industrial era economic accomplishments occurred despite the loss of a substantial proportion of national income to support a corrupt, decadent, and profligate aristocracy.

My delegation supports the timetable proposed by the Secretary General to achieve the target of 0.7 per cent of gross national income for official development assistance by 2015.

Here let me place special emphasis on the allocation of 0.15 to 0.2 per cent of gross national income to official development assistance for the least developed countries.

And, in the wake of WWII, most countries erected elaborate social welfare states in which the public sector expanded to more than 40 of national income on average.

All developed countries should make timetables for reaching the target of 0.7 per cent of gross national income for international development assistance by the year 2015.

The representative of the European Union had stated that the most accurate reflection of capacity to pay was gross national income (GNI) and that there could be no basis for exceptions to that principle.

The increases and decreases therein result from changes in per capita GNI and population data as calculated using the agreed distribution methodology.

There have also been recent improvements in the overall levels of ODA, which reached 78.6 billion in 2004 (0.25 per cent of the national income of donor countries).

However, since the level of government funding usually depends on the level of national income, Governments in least developed countries are least likely to afford large outlays for population activities.

It also affirmed its commitment to provide the designated percentage of gross national product as development assistance, of which 15 per cent will be earmarked for least developed countries by 2006.

It favoured a six year base period for the scale of assessments, since it would help to smooth out the impact of short term fluctuations in GNI and promote stability in the scale.

We also hope that the progressive increases proposed will mean that the least developed countries will receive 0.2 per cent of those countries' gross national income, as agreed in the Brussels Programme of Action.